You have no proof for point 1.
The second point again is not 'proof' of anything, you are acting as if Pacquaio is immune to being knocked down, and if he gets knocked down something 'must' be wrong with him, as opposed to Marquez just improving. You assume everything is to do with Pacquaio and not the opponent, and there lies the problem.
The second point again is not 'proof' of anything, you are acting as if Pacquaio is immune to being knocked down, and if he gets knocked down something 'must' be wrong with him, as opposed to Marquez just improving. You assume everything is to do with Pacquaio and not the opponent, and there lies the problem.
Comment