Who has the Better Resume Froch or Calzaghe?

[Bushbaby]

I mean outside of Jeff Lacy, what other signature victory does he have. The B-Hop fight was razor close and I thought Hop won with cleaner effective shots. And Jones was a shot as a stop sign.

[trainhard_187]

Calslappy best of this generation period.. Retires undefeated

46 have tried 46 have failed.. Floyd cant say that.. Calslappy

[DeepSleep]

We are comparing:

Calzaghe: Shot Eubank, Lacy, Bika, Kessler, 43 year old Hopkins and Shot Jones Jr.

Froch: Pascal, Taylor, Dirrel, Kessler, Abraham, Old Johnson, Ward, Bute and Kessler(Fading)

Not sure how this is even a discussion.

[Cardinal Buck]

We are comparing:

Calzaghe: Shot Eubank, Lacy, Bika, Kessler, 43 year old Hopkins and Shot Jones Jr.

Froch: Pascal, Taylor, Dirrel, Kessler, Abraham, Old Johnson, Ward, Bute and Kessler(Fading)

Not sure how this is even a discussion.

No dumbass, Froch lost to Ward. If he won that fight, he would, in fact, actually have a better resume.

[Ezzard Charles]

if you're gonna go by if's and but's....

calzaghe lost to hopkins.... and robin reid.....

and froch lost to dirrell.....

so of the real elite fighters froch has fought.... dirrell and ward.... he lost to both....

and calzaghe got taught a boxing lesson by an old b-hop.... no shame in that.....

the point.... neither they both lose.

[D-MiZe]

Anyone who says something ridiculous like...

'It's Froch and it's not even close'

...is a fucking idiot. It's a case of everyone being pro-Froch on here and somewhat negative towards Calzaghe. 'Oh but Froch fought such great competition, consecutively...!' Yea cause he was contractually obliged to fight the best at 168 for fuck sake.

Big fan of Froch, do not like Calzaghe, but don't get it twisted.

[sdcluser]

Anyone who says something ridiculous like...

'It's Froch and it's not even close'

...is a fucking idiot. It's a case of everyone being pro-Froch on here and somewhat negative towards Calzaghe. 'Oh but Froch fought such great competition, consecutively...!' Yea cause he was contractually obliged to fight the best at 168 for fuck sake.

Big fan of Froch, do not like Calzaghe, but don't get it twisted.

So you do agree Froch fought better competition and has better resume?

[DeepSleep]

No dumbass, Froch lost to Ward. If he won that fight, he would, in fact, actually have a better resume.

Win or lose it's on his resume. Froch fought live guys while Calzaghe sat back and avoided them.

[D-MiZe]

So you do agree Froch fought better competition and has better resume?

No and yes.

Better resume in terms of better wins, Calzaghe having the better win in Hopkins. I think it's really close, Froch was definitely behind Calzaghe before last night and now I have him ahead... just.

Think I'm going to go through Calzaghe's resume some time this week.

[PunchesNbuncheS]

Is this even a serious question? Calzaghes resume is weak as hell. Of course Froch has a better resume. Froch fights everyone without ducking or waiting till they get old. Yeah he may have lost a few but at least he had the balls to dare to be great. Calzaghe waited like an opportunistic bottom feeder.