Should Lebedev have been deducted 2 points for Pushing?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • F!x
    replied
    Originally posted by frosty-g
    Since when was conundrum synonymous with b!tching?
    A conundrum can be perceived as many things. That perception is dependent upon the predisposition of the observer.

    Leave a comment:


  • frosty-g
    replied
    Originally posted by F!x
    it's called a "conundrum" - the answer is ultimately based on conjecture.. i'd guess it's significantly above your pay grade.
    Since when was conundrum synonymous with b!tching?

    Leave a comment:


  • F!x
    replied
    Originally posted by Hitman932
    LOL - this thread is pure ******ation
    it's called a "conundrum" - the answer is ultimately based on conjecture.. i'd guess it's significantly above your pay grade.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hitman932
    replied
    LOL - this thread is pure ******ation

    Leave a comment:


  • frosty-g
    replied
    Khan was behaving like a ***** and kept ignoring the ref even after losing the first point, shoulda been disqualified
    Get over it

    Leave a comment:


  • Should Lebedev have been deducted 2 points for Pushing?

    7
    Yes - just like in Khan vs Peterson
    57.14%
    4
    No - point deductions in Khan vs Peterson were bad calls
    42.86%
    3
    Lebedev was pushing Jones all night, should he have been deducted at least 2 points? Khan was deducted 2 points for pushing in the Peterson fight, and he did no more pushing than Lebedev.

    Or was Lebedev's pushing fine, not worthy of point deductions, which means the deductions against Khan in the Peterson were unjustified?
Working...
TOP