Comments Thread For: Eddie Hearn Maps Out a Big Career Run For Carl Froch

[Bushbaby]

Good for Froch. I remember the 1st time I seen him, wasn't too impressed. But the guy grew on me like if I worked at a fish market. Froch is definitely 1 of the top reason's boxing is still on my mind.

[Weebler I]

well let me tell you it doesnt matter if stevenson doesnt have a name and ppl dont want to watch dirrell. whoever wins that fight is frochs mandatory and if he chooses to enforce that froch will either have to fight him or get stripped of his belt. that cant be overlooked when discussong frochs future.

and for the record whoever wins between stevenson and dirrell deserve a title shot at 168 more than pavlik and either one of them would be a much tougher fight.

you should give dirrell a break for the froch performace. he never been to that level, fougth at that pace or even went 12 rounds before so he tried to conserve his energy in the middle rounds. it an obvious case of pure inexperience, if you watched him since hes fought much better and been very entertaining.

It wasn't just the Froch performance, it was his behaviour v Abraham too. The guy is talented no doubt, but boxing is as much about the intangibles.

froch-dirrell 2 is a great fight, to pretend dirrell is the same fighter he was 3 years ago is borderline ******ed.

It really isn't and if you re-watch the first fight you'll see why. That fight actually took place at 2am and it stunk the place out, people won't be queuing up to buy tickets.

Ultimately Dirrell doesn't come to fight, and that's hard to sell to both Froch and the fans.