Originally posted by lacson
View Post
Originally posted by hugh grant
View Post
Without those two fights, Pacquiao would not even be considered at the top. Arum, Roach and Pacquiao has used name recognition of fighters who were once at the top to fool the masses into believing that Pacquiao beat top contenders/champions. Without them being top ranked three, the legacy value would be absent. Cotto was ranked 4th. Margarito wasn't even ranked as he was banned.
Originally posted by lacson
View Post
No has argued that Manny did not win. The dispute lies within the legitimacy and therefore the value of the fight towards Pacquiao's legacy. Manny was able to win under special conditions that have negated any legacy value. If he was the warrior that you so desperately want him to be, he would have taken those fights without catchweights.
The biggest issue that you peasant morons refuse to acknowledge is that the way Arum, Roach and Pacquiao used the catchweights was a blatant tactic. Pacquiao had made the WW limit previously TWICE. There was no issue making weight for Pacquiao. Team Pacquiao just counted on certain groups of fans being so ****** as to not realize that Manny had made the limit before.
Catchweights are for men who cannot make weight and are facing insurmountable odds. Pacquiao had already proven he could make weight, but STILL insisted on draining his opponents.
Only those who are willfully oblivious pretend that these facts don't severely damage the perception and the reality of Manny Pacquiao's legacy.
Originally posted by D4thincarnation
View Post
Hence Miguel stating "I will not sacrifice my body again for Pacquiao".
But by the time you read this, you will have forgotten all of it 50 First Dates!
Comment