80s 160lbers vs Modern Day 160 and 168

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DJR005
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 360
    • 29
    • 0
    • 6,907

    #1

    80s 160lbers vs Modern Day 160 and 168

    I was talking with a friend about how the Middleweights/Super Middleweights of today would do against the likes of the greats from the 80's ( Hagler, Hearns, Leonard, Duran, even though Durans prime weight was below 160). I think that Ward, B-hop, Calzaghe would've given them good fights but in the end the 80's era would prob come out on top. What u think?
  • bojangles1987
    bo jungle
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 41118
    • 1,326
    • 357
    • 63,028

    #2
    Hopkins at middleweight gives any of them a fight and has at least a decent chance. Calzaghe could be competitive, I wouldn't pick him against many though. Ward we'll see about, but he has a chance to join that conversation. Everyone else has done nothing to suggest they belong in this conversation.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP