Are pac fans making floyd more relevant then pac because of there hatred?

[silentscoper]

don't know about philippine and filippinos. hagler is black. he's from america. same thing with chop corley, holmes, foreman, wilbon, etc. they all call floyd a duck.

truth hurts, i know.

keep making it a racial issue, though. who are we kidding?

I don't understand why you keep trying to spin this as a race issue. Nor do I understand why you listed a bunch of Americans. It was just information that showed that Manny Pacquiao's country spends most of their athlete search queries on Floyd Mayweather. I fail to see how that is a racially charged statement in any way. Where is the derogatory comment about the people of the Phillipines? There wasn't. It was simply the amusing fact that Floyd is one of the highest searched athletes there.

Ironically those are some people who expressed their view that Marquez beat Pacquiao on the 3rd fight. Their opinion is their opinion, those who choose to respect it do, those who don't do not. Why did you feel the need to bring up these boxers when he posted something about Floyd being searched? I fail to see the relevance outside of Floyd being mentioned.

[al-Xander]

i think it would even be better if the master thread is moved somewhere not visible in most visited forums like fantasy fights section or something. the goal should be to suspend this mayweather/pac discussions until floyd grows balls to fight pac. i mean a total news blackout of may/pac news and discussions should be implemented. i'm sure majority of people are sick of these discussions. man, it's been three years.

people need to leave floyd alone. i don't mind the pac hatred threads. haha... i'm mature enough to know pacman is the greatest right now. you could tell from his scared opponents.

This might actually work. Floyd doesn't respond to pressure. Most people with that kind of ego don't. People really do have to move past this fight. Three years is long enough.

[SkillspayBills]

These are facts.
1.Floyd haters make more threads about Floyd Mayweather than his fans do.
2.Floyd haters post more about FMJ than his fans do.

[silentscoper]

When you start a thread that's based on pure conjecture without any concrete facts to support it, and that thread tends to denigrate either the boxer or his fans, that's a hate thread, period. Had the ts been more objective and showed evidences to support his premiss then the accusation of bias and hate would have less credence. But the fact that he did not have anything concrete to support his statement and the fact that the most available proof is in this forum which, unfortunately for him, showed the opposite of what he is is spouting, clearly indicates a questionable agenda on the part of the ts.

I agree that he has provided no concrete facts. But neither have you. 3 pages out of thousands and thousands isn't anything concrete either. Though I do acknowledge that you have actually provided some evidence unlike the thread starter (none). However, the evidence you provided is far from solid as 3 pages of threads which is barely representative of 2 or 3 days much less the months and years people have spent on the forum. Granted it would be tedious and a damn waste of time to comb through thousands of pages I don't believe you have a firm ground to stand on with your statement that your evidence is a firm fact. Simply because your argument is slightly better (due to provided evidence) does not mean it is true. The data will speak the truth, you just haven't provided enough of it yet.

I don't believe we have any disagreement on this being a hate thread though, it is one, though in my opinion everything stated has been aimed towards fans of Pacquiao for the most part and not to denigrate Pacquiao.

All that said, I believe we should be done with these relevance threads. They are not pertinent to anything of importance or substance.

[Best in Boxing]

These are facts.
1.Floyd haters make more threads about Floyd Mayweather than his fans do.
2.Floyd haters post more about FMJ than his fans do.

^^^^^^^ this

/ end thread

[al-Xander]

hate to repeat this.

the profile of a floyd fanboy is basically a sad little boy who wants all the toys leaving nothing for other kids: pacman is amateurish. he's one-dimensional. he's a come-forward, easy-to-hit boxer. he's overrated. he fought shot, weight-drained fighters. jmm beat him three times. in the same paragraph you will see pac has to take the most stringent test that was ever demanded of a boxer, basically destroying their amateurish logic. you can't have both homeys. you can either say pac is superman or pac is a weak, unskilled boxer. otherwise, you'd look like the sad little kid i'm talking about in the first part of this post.

then this fanatics's insistence that pac is not worth that much. believe me, if i were pac i'd just ignore that boring boxer. he doesn't deserve even 40 split. let him rot and stay looking like a duck for the rest of his life.

so nahh. majority of folks around the world don't take these fanatics seriously. they are in the minority. truth hurts, i know.

thanks for playing. keep 'em coming, guys.

It's a sad profile. In reality, Floyd is the one giving his fans problems. This Floyd is better than Pac and vise versa would have been settled a long time ago if only Floyd had the balls to fight Pac.

[tatangb45]

I agree that he has provided no concrete facts. But neither have you. 3 pages out of thousands and thousands isn't anything concrete either. Though I do acknowledge that you have actually provided some evidence unlike the thread starter (none). However, the evidence you provided is far from solid as 3 pages of threads which is barely representative of 2 or 3 days much less the months and years people have spent on the forum. Granted it would be tedious and a damn waste of time to comb through thousands of pages I don't believe you have a firm ground to stand on with your statement that your evidence is a firm fact. Simply because your argument is slightly better (due to provided evidence) does not mean it is true. The data will speak the truth, you just haven't provided enough of it yet.

I don't believe we have any disagreement on this being a hate thread though, it is one, though in my opinion everything stated has been aimed towards fans of Pacquiao for the most part and not to denigrate Pacquiao.

All that said, I believe we should be done with these relevance threads. They are not pertinent to anything of importance or substance.

Have you heard of sampling? In surveys, you don't have to ask everyone to get an idea of a general consensus. 3 pages of more than 20 threads per page makes it more credible than anything anyone has shown in any of the posts made in this thread.
You can test the next three pages if you doubt the accuracy of my process.

[silentscoper]

Have you heard of sampling? In surveys, you don't have to ask everyone to get an idea of a general consensus. 3 pages of more than 20 threads per page makes it more credible than anything anyone has shown in any of the posts made in this thread.
You can test the next three pages if you doubt the accuracy of my process.

Of course I know what sampling is, I noted that your sample was too small earlier to be representative of the entire population. Like you said, you get enough to have an idea of a general consensus. 3 pages while more credible than anything else anyone has shown is hardly representative of a month's posting. I had a little time on my hands so I went through 39 pages and 39 pages later the post dates are still only at April 1st. My count was more to the line of

12 Floyd Hate/Discredit Threads
8 Pacquiao Hate/Discredit Threads

Now by no means does this prove that there are more Floyd Hate/Discredit threads on average than Pacquiao Hate/Discredit Threads, I'm simply putting forward the evidence to refute your claims. If you go back further you may find the ratio change some more.

[hugh grant]

The only reason Floyd is talked about cos of his ducking of Pac, people think Floyd is a bit ecentric and cant understand his behaviour.

[iNDOSMOKE]

Hmm I see 3 threads on the first page all about PAC from Floyd fans. I don't see any from the PAC fans.