Tweet
You still don't ****ing get it 
Pacquiao only has to prove he was defamed, he doesn't have to prove any financial loss. He can do that easily. He can also prove that his reputation was damaged and therefore his potential earning power decreased by just showing this site and youtube pages (nicknames like 'pacroid' didn't exist before Floyd's campaign).
And if Pacquiao's legal counsel is filing for $5-$10 mil+, then there's a reason for that- that's the amount they are expecting the court to rule for.
And like I said before and as you have proven in our correspondence, you are talking out of your ass. You speak matter-of-factly about something whose basics you still can't comprehend. You clearly still can't grasp the simple difference between compensatory and punitive damages. But you already know how this will all play out and that it's no big deal despite what the judge himself says.
Whatever floats your boat
Pacquiao only has to prove he was defamed, he doesn't have to prove any financial loss. He can do that easily. He can also prove that his reputation was damaged and therefore his potential earning power decreased by just showing this site and youtube pages (nicknames like 'pacroid' didn't exist before Floyd's campaign).
And if Pacquiao's legal counsel is filing for $5-$10 mil+, then there's a reason for that- that's the amount they are expecting the court to rule for.
And like I said before and as you have proven in our correspondence, you are talking out of your ass. You speak matter-of-factly about something whose basics you still can't comprehend. You clearly still can't grasp the simple difference between compensatory and punitive damages. But you already know how this will all play out and that it's no big deal despite what the judge himself says.
Whatever floats your boat
Comment