Boxing fan ask Breadman "Would Pac beat Hearns, Leonard, Duran & Trinidad?"

[F l i c k e r]

It's not about you giving Pac props or not. It's about how illogical you can be. You think Pac might beat this version of Floyd but losses to Linares at 126

It's quite logical. Is it generally accepted? No.

I am sure there was people who thought Buster Douglas would beat Tyson. Is that illogical? Who won that fight in the end?

So I don't even get where your coming from.

[LeG00N]

in my humble opinion



Hearns murders him .... don't see it going past 4 rounds
Duran and Leonard stop him mid to late rounds


Tito has a tendency of getting dropped, so I see him getting dropped early in the fight. Not really sure the outcome of the fight, but I do think Pacquiao has an actual chance.

[jrosales13]

It's quite logical. Is it generally accepted? No.

I am sure there was people who thought Buster Douglas would beat Tyson. Is that illogical? Who won that fight in the end?

So I don't even get where your coming from.

Oh....The Tyson-Douglas comeback

[FeFist]

Pac quite possibly beats them all on his day. Hearns at ww he is weight drained, and his missiles are telegraphed from miles. Pac would dismantle Hearns. He wouldnt be target practice for hearns like Duran was on the ropes. Plus hearn dont throw that many punches in bunches.

At Welterweight he went 14 rounds with Leonard. He sets his right hand up with an exceptional jab.

It's laughable that you talk about how telegraphed Hearns shots are when Pacquiao punches would come across as wild swings due to the range and height disadvantage.

[IMDAZED]

What is your reason that he doesn't have a shot?

Pac can't outbox Tito and he can't outbrawl him. He'd get flattened.

[Shogunofharlem1]

I know this is off topic but since we are talking about Tito I wanted to post this.


Ive been laughing for the last 20 minutes rewatching this.

[hugh grant]

People like to underestimate what Pac can do, when its a fantasy fight, and theres no chance of the fight ever happening so they cant be proved categorically wrong.

When the opponent is Pacs next victim and is actually going to face Pac, their brave predictions of what they think will happen to Pac, becomes more realistic.
Pac becomes favourite.

[IronDanHamza]

People like to underestimate what Pac can do, when its a fantasy fight, and theres no chance of the fight ever happening so they cant be proved categorically wrong.

When the opponent is Pacs next victim and is actually going to face Pac, their brave predictions of what they think will happen to Pac, becomes more realistic.
Pac becomes favourite.

That might be because Pac hasn't fought anyone on Tommy Hearns or Ray Leonards level at WW.

If Pac were to fight Hearns or Leonard at WW he wouldn't be the favourite.

[FeFist]

People like to underestimate what Pac can do, when its a fantasy fight, and theres no chance of the fight ever happening so they cant be proved categorically wrong.

When the opponent is Pacs next victim and is actually going to face Pac, their brave predictions of what they think will happen to Pac, becomes more realistic.
Pac becomes favourite.

Pacquiao wouldn't be a favorite against Hearns. You're a twit I strongly believe that what you know of Hearns is what you've read on his Wiki page.

[F l i c k e r]

Duran stop him mid to late rounds

Really? There isn't that much of a size difference between them. Duran weighed more at WW but not much of a difference in measurements.

Oh....The Tyson-Douglas comeback

lol, no response to it? I can go Pavlik-Hopkins. Margarito-Mosely. Mosely-Cotto. Floyd-Corrales. etc etc etc. SRL-Hagler. Old men but still. SRL wasn't expected to win. 6:1 odds before dropping 3:1 closer to the fight.

It'd be different if I didn't state reasons for why I believed what I believe. I didn't just go "he wins just because". I gave reasoning for it and not the "he's a magical ninja that can dodge air" reasoning either.

Not generally accepted =//= illogical.

You don't believe ODLH is great. Does that make you illogical?