Originally posted by Sugar Sting Ray
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Infamous emails sent from Team Pacquiao to Team mayweather
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Eastbay Giant View PostListen, I personally don't care about the emails, I just want to see them fight. WADA PED testing and this law suit are preventing it from happening. I also don't care how long it took Top Rank to get control over his business, but it is a clear motive as to why a Mayweather fight is not in their best interest. A loss to Mayweather, and the Bank Safe begins to close as swiftly as it began to open.
Back to my focus, Ben Thompson's evaluation on the email situation makes sense given what we know at this point.
from what i've read, mr. thompson's evaluation on the email situation is that he believes its possible that someone in Pac's camp could have asked those questions, but in that its very likely that Pac himself wasn't aware of it.
but all that analysis is pretty much moot considering that as of my writing this, there has not been a single one of those "phantom" emails that surfaced.
i mean cmon. is it too difficult to simply open the incriminating emails and press "print"?
Comment
-
Originally posted by bMak View PostI get the feeling many of you commenting on this article/info, have done everything but READ it. Ben questions the e-mails, and how Smith got his info.
you know, his long winded post could have been summarized by three phrases:
no emails.
no proof.
no case.
AND
I disagreed with ben's stand about the 14 or 7 day window. urine testing is more than sufficient to detect PEDS and the ONLY thing blood testing is better than urine is in detecting HGH, in which 14 days not to mention 7 days taking it is totally insufficient for it to have a significant effect.
mosley took PEDs FOR TWO WHOLE MONTHS and he barely won against dela hoya.
and he expected a MIRACLE in seven days?
yeah right.Last edited by AFighter4U; 06-27-2011, 01:14 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sugar Sting Ray View PostLOL These million man march participants are helping Fighter of the Decade's slander case against Wifebeater.
How is Pacquiao going to prove he deserves monetary damages from "perceived loss endorsements" with published statement like these in circulation?
Originally posted by Eastbay Giant View PostIt has been a consistent complaint of those who venture into the world of Team Pacquiao, a loosely aligned, often disorganized collection of associates and friends of the world's most popular fighter, many of whom claim to represent him but few of whom deliver.
Bill King -The Sports Business Journal
"I love Manny," said Sandoval, senior director of athlete relations for EA Sports. "He's been good to me personally and good for the company. He would have been the ideal guy for the cover of our 'Fight Night' game. But because of all the layers of people out there representing him or claiming to represent him, I didn't want to do it.
"The left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing. I'm not subjecting my company to that."
Sandy Sandoval - EA Sports
These statements above regarding "Team Pacquiao" are consistent with Ben Thompson's evaluation. Neither you nor I are privy to the amount of undisclosed information he, and credible journalist like Tim Smith have access to. Only a coward would drag race into a discussion about information.
Think about that...
Comment
-
Originally posted by SekondzOut View Postyou can't fight a war using weapons like that man...you make the rest of yall look like real lil' dudes when you shoot off like that...the race card is such a non-****in factor when you come to the table to play cards with the big boys....why not complain about ALL the negative press Floyd gets from the white owned ****?!?...stay in the playground lil' man...you're no help to your ppl in this war....your earth gave birth to something less than whats needed to help your ppl through this diificult time of "whatever is in the dark will hit the light".....accepting the truth isnt easy when it may hurt you....only a big boy can do that...lil' dudes dont have that type of mental power....don't take this as a diss lil' man...just take it as a ***el or lesson that will help you win a war of words next time you decide to fight with them...step ya mental game up...alot of nerds on here so the articulate part of the game around here is well repped...so you dont have to be all goody good with the vocab...just know how to score without using the non ****in factor card....play fair!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by AFighter4U View Postand that's exactly how i want it.
nothing helps your name better than a painfully biased source harping the same tired, ****** and baseless accusations against you, over and over again.
this is why i always eagerly anticipate floyd sr and jr's rants against pac.
the more they open their mouths, the dumber they look and the better for Pac. they're practically giving him free endorsements.Originally posted by AFighter4U View Postoh i've read ben's article alright.
you know, his long winded post could have been summarized by three phrases:
no emails.
no proof.
no case.
I'm failing to see the malice- many can't handle Pacquiao being remotely questioned.
Comment
-
“Now, I challenge Smith, Atlas along with ESPN to show their
evidence for the sake of justice if they have any respect left
for themselves and real professional etiquette. If not, then I
will call them liars as long as I live”
-manny pacquiao
funny thing... Teddy and tim never did get back to many about that evidence. And floyd had a perfect opportunity to, under oath, present those incriminating emails at his court ordered deposition. But for some reason he ducked that like a one dimensional filipino lawyer was going to take his testimony
maybe they're all waiting on michael moorer to reveal himself as the mole who informed floyd's camp about the a-side meth abuse going down in pac's camp?
anyone dumb enough to believe any of this is anything more than the most elaborate and hilarious duck of all time needs to slap their mother for not using protection or getting that ********
Comment
-
Originally posted by AFighter4U View Postwell, we agree there in that i also just want to see them fight.
from what i've read, mr. thompson's evaluation on the email situation is that he believes its possible that someone in Pac's camp could have asked those questions, but in that its very likely that Pac himself wasn't aware of it.
but all that analysis is pretty much moot considering that as of my writing this, there has not been a single one of those "phantom" emails that surfaced.
i mean cmon. is it too difficult to simply open the incriminating emails and press "print"?
Comment
-
Originally posted by bMak View PostHe explained the situation, gave a little backstory for those unaware of the details, then breaks down the IS. After that, as he clearly states, he gives his own opinion.
I'm failing to see the malice- many can't handle Pacquiao being remotely questioned.
his logic is simply flawed.
my previous statement was regarding the website and those who constantly accuse pac as a whole.
there are indeed those who still question pac without malice, but it doesn't mean their logic isn't flawed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic View PostWhat I don't understand is why is Pac only putting the lawsuit on Floyd as a boxer and not others who have said something similar about Pac. Why didn't he sue Teddy Atlas as well apart from GBP?
Comment
Comment