-
-
Naz had 15 title defences. he should be in the HOFComment
-
I wrote something which addressed all your wack 'points'. Maybe I should feel anger for having dignified that shower of ****e you typed with such an articulate response, but I don't...yet.
Again, where have I expressed any anger about Hamed losing to Barrera? That's not even the crux of the discussion here. Losing 8 rounds out of 12 and not being hurt by a Top 100 ATG is no shameful thing, and surely nothing for a Hamed fan to be 'mad' about 10 years later.
You compared Barrera and Morales' records to Naz' as though McGuigan's wouldn't also fare unfavorably in comparison to theirs.
Comparing Naz' record to Barrera's and Morales' doesn't change the fact that Hamed's record >>> McGuigan's + his natural talent far exceeds McGuigan's + his cultural impact far exceeds McGuigan's + he would quite possibly have finished McGuigan's career in an alternate universe where they could have met in their primes.
You're clearly a ******. These are Hamed's first few years of eligibility; it's hardly a big deal and I wasn't even in the threads complaining when he wasn't among the 2010 entrants. It's hard to get 'mad' about something that is an almost certain eventuality, anyway. Nazzy will be in the HOF.
Ohh, slick.
Name me a fighter Hamed lost to, much less was stopped by, who was equivalent to a Jim McDonnell.
The best in Naseem's era was Barrera, a Top 100 ATG, and Hamed fought a prime version and lost by about 8 rounds to 4.
Now name me a GREAT fighter that McGuigan beat when they were great.
LMAO, McGuigan only beat 'the best' when the best was past it. Hamed lost to a prime Top 100 ATG by about 8 rounds to 4 and fought only once more before calling it a day. McGuigan got stopped by Jim McDonnell and never fought again. LMAO. FACTS, accept them.
No, you're b*tching because more learned posters than you observed that McGuigan has a less worthy HOF claim than Hamed.
I didn't make any jokes.
Almost every fighter is overrated by some people at some point in time. A guy you mention favorably earlier in the thread, Tyson, is hugely overrated in by some.
Perhaps the only fighter who can't possibly be overrated is SRR.
Hamed is more often underrated than he is overrated. The majority of smart observers, however, acknowledge him correctly as a deserving future Hall Of Famer who had a world of natural ability.
And Naz had a ton of fighting heart, displayed in the ring. He never did anything between the ropes that should call his fighting heart into question.
You're just crying because Naz is Greater than McGuigan. That's the bottom line.Comment
-
LOL@ at anyone thinking Hamed had a better career than Mike Tyson. It's not even close. And if you believe that, either you're a ****ing idiot, or Birtish. (Or both.
)
Comment
-
no he shouldn't be exepted into the HOF, look at his resume for Christ sake and compare that to Morales or Barrera
Comment
Tweet
Comment