Comments Thread For: CompuBox: Bradley vs Alexander Post-Fight Analysis

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: CompuBox: Bradley vs Alexander Post-Fight Analysis

    The moment Timothy Bradley and Devon Alexander signed to put their WBO and WBC junior welterweight titles on the line, most experts knew it was an evenly matched contest. Once it ended, that’s exactly how it turned out – at least from a statistical standpoint.

    [Click Here To Read More]
  • amayseng
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 2359
    • 134
    • 11
    • 8,801

    #2
    no way these compubox stats are correct in any manner


    i thought a blow had to land to be counted...

    Comment

    • gauze
      white lives matter
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 4150
      • 624
      • 323
      • 10,187

      #3
      Originally posted by amayseng
      no way these compubox stats are correct in any manner


      i thought a blow had to land to be counted...
      i disagree with and get baffled by the punch stats a lot, especially on hbo broadcasts. i dont even pay that much attention to them anymore. afterall, it is just some guys watching it on tv and pressing a button (i think)

      Comment

      • NaijaD
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 3444
        • 204
        • 215
        • 30,256

        #4
        i knew the number of connects were close but it didnt matter because there was no thud to devons punches so it looked like bradley was winning anyway. I wish devon the best as im a fan of his and hope he takes on maidana and re-establishes his name.

        Comment

        • Pullcounter
          no guts no glory
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2004
          • 42582
          • 549
          • 191
          • 49,739

          #5
          Originally posted by amayseng
          no way these compubox stats are correct in any manner


          i thought a blow had to land to be counted...
          a lot of those punches landed but weren't flush.

          Comment

          • daggum
            All time great
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2008
            • 43521
            • 4,572
            • 3
            • 166,270

            #6
            Originally posted by amayseng
            no way these compubox stats are correct in any manner


            i thought a blow had to land to be counted...
            ever seen the calzaghe-hopkins compubox stats? the most hilarious and wrong thing ever. anyone who takes these stats and uses them as some kind of evidence their fighter deserved to win is an imbecile.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP