The Klit-ites have been severley owned in this thread, and not just by me. You only need to look at the poll results. I bet it really grinds the klit-ites gears that the majority of all people will never consider Vitali as a top 10 heavyweight of all time. They can keep spewing their ******ed bull**** over and over again but they will never be able to convince the real boxing fans that Vitali is one of the best heavyweights of all time.
And that's the bottom line and all the Klitschko nuthuggers are and have been OWNED throughout this entire thread.
Prime RJJ would destroy Ezzard Charlese but Charles is still ranked ahead AT
just like a primee Tyson would destroy Frazieer. but Frazier is ranked ahead AT
Here we have a case of a HOFer in Vlad...... who is inferior to his brother Vitali H2H.
That is just a fact.
Honestly if you idiots believe, Tyson, Frazier, Marciaano, Dempsey, Jack Johson, Joe Louis would stand a chance against a prime Vitali on their respective best days. You're smoking some ****.
Yes he is. Match up wise his power, size, range and work rate is just a big tool in his armory.
Then his chin.
The man is a beast and can take licks aswell as give it.
His stamina and worKrate is very good.
He never had good footwork and bad posture, but hard to capitalise on it anyway
Resume is the only real accurate way of judging a fighters greatness. Klit-ites always bring up hypothetical match ups on how Vitali would crush every heavyweight known too man, but at the end of the day it doesn't mean ****. It's not what he could have done... IT'S WHAT HE ACTUALLY ****IN DID. And Vitali as good as you might think he is, never proved it against good opposition.
Resume is fact ok? A fighters resume can't be argued... h2h ability and hypothetical match ups are all OPPINIONS. Something you Klit-ites are unable to comprehend.
Resume is the only real accurate way of judging a fighters greatness. Klit-ites always bring up hypothetical match ups on how Vitali would crush every heavyweight known too man, but at the end of the day it doesn't mean ****. It's not what he could have done... IT'S WHAT HE ACTUALLY ****IN DID. And Vitali as good as you might think he is, never proved it against good opposition.
Resume is fact ok? A fighters resume can't be argued... h2h ability and hypothetical match ups are all OPPINIONS. Something you Klit-ites are unable to comprehend.
he has proved it by out-boxing Lewis convincingly before the cut-stoppage.
lewis was a goner at the point of the stoppage too. very very lucky.
he also brutally KOed every fighter that has KOed KD'ed his brother(HOFer) while his brother didn't avenge some of those losses.
Honestly if you idiots believe, Tyson, Frazier, Marciaano, Dempsey, Jack Johson, Joe Louis would stand a chance against a prime Vitali on their respective best days. You're smoking some ****.
Joe Louis has more 1 punch KOs than anyone in history. Who exactly has Vitali defeated with the skill/power of a Joe Louis?
Who has he defeated, period.... that was rated above class D?
I can show you 3 guys who were of similar size to Vitali who were put to sleep by Joe :
You guys haven't owned jack...you spew the same ole... same ole drivel to discredit Vitali but can't refute any of the facts which clearly show that sans injuries Vitali has destroyed every fighter that's got in the ring with him.
He's THE only fighter in heavyweight history that's prominent where there's NO prime evidence that he can be beat in a fair & legit way. To beat someone by injuries when the refs never even waved off the fights especially when that fighter is tapping that azz handily is to just get the W on your record....nothing else. That's the bottom line people. This guy has NOT lost more than 2 rds in any singular bout. His worst showing was against Lewis when he ONLY won 2/3 of the fight. Think about that for a second.
. THe dude won 12 of the 15 rds he FOUGHT against Byrd & Lewis combined as seen by the scoring judges at ringside. FoR THOSE that don't know how to do math & site these losses as legit..that's 20% where Lewis & Byrd luckily outboxed him & the 3 rds they did win were the last 3rds before the bout was stopped due to severe injuries & NOTHING ELSE.. BOTH fighters were being outboxed..outslugged..outthrown..outlanded for the first 12 rds combined based on all the officials scorecards...where i come from that's 120-108...& a unanimous decision.
Think about that for a second before YOU say he lost to the 2 best fighters he ever fought. IF THEY WERE BETTER THAN HIM WOULDN'T THEY HAVE WON 1 RD BETWEEN THEM FOR THE FIRST 12 RDS THEY COLLECTIVELY FOUGHT HIM WHEN HE WAS RELATIVELY (PHYSICALLY) HEALTHY? Did Vitali Not CLOSE the show in style in both instances? Hell to the yes.. but make NO MISTAKE he was the better boxer in both bouts by miles & would easily have beaten both in a LEGIT manner unlike the way they beat him & don't think those 2 fighters don't know this. They were in the ring with him. They might talk all tough about how they beat him but there's a reason both did not face him again!
Whether it was cuts or not the bottom line is LENNOX STOPPED VITALI. And i don't even like Lennox, but that is simply the bottom line and yes that DOES count as a loss.
Comment