Tweet
Ive only seen Khan fight Three times. Against Prescott which he got KO. Then Against Malignaggi and then Maidana. As for Naseem Hamed ive seen more fights of him and he was awkward but devestating puncher . I wonder how they are compared in the Uk since they are both ******s?? who is more popular or considered the better fighter. IMO Hamed was much better!!!!
-
-
Khan has a bright future ahead of him. -
Possible and No.
Khan has more technical skills and speed, Naz more raw power.
Naz was a bigger draw although Khan is big himself.Comment
-
NAz created a big buzz when he foughtComment
-
You out your mind Nazeem was way better than Khan in every way.Comment
-
Hamed was a bigger name than Lewis and was the face of HBO boxing along with Oscar De La Hoya. So no, Amir is not more popular than the prince.
As far as more talented....no Amir isn't close to Hamed. Amir isn't in his prime and has a tremendous upside, so both of these questions should be properly answered in a few years.Comment
-
The Prince was a superstar. He was a knockout artist and good against bums. I love the Prince, but talent wise Amir is WAY better. As for popularity, well unless Amir becomes HBO's golden boy and sells out arenas then I don't see him being as popular as the prince.Comment
-
Khan is FAR more skilled then Naz was on his best day. Naz was awkward with power. That only lasts so long and then you go down hill once your reflexes slow. Khan on the other hand has the skills to be a factor for a long, long time (assuming his chin continues to hold up.) Popularity? I cant imagine Khan is nearly as popular as Naz was yet.Comment
-
sorry i can't agree that amir is more talented then naz i just don't see it
plus naz was never knocked out in 1 roundComment
Comment