Sam Peter is Wlad's IBF MANDATORY, the IBF has ordered Wlad to fight him

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Hammer
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 50797
    • 3,416
    • 8,704
    • 58,851

    #1

    Sam Peter is Wlad's IBF MANDATORY, the IBF has ordered Wlad to fight him

    Some of the Klitschko haters have been saying that Wlad is handpicking Sam Peter.

    But the fact is, Wlad has been ORDERED by the IBF to fight Peter.

    When the IBF removed Alexander Povetkin's mandatory status, they made IBF #2 Sam Peter the mandatory and ordered Wlad to fight him.
  • The Hammer
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 50797
    • 3,416
    • 8,704
    • 58,851

    #2
    Originally posted by //-GreatJoe-//
    As Sam Peter put up such a hearty, courageous effort in against Vitali, I cannot wait to see this match.

    !!Sarcasm Alert!!
    Sam Peter looked good in his last fight (against Aguilera), that's how he received his mandatory status.

    Comment

    • Hatton_Is_God
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 294
      • 15
      • 6
      • 6,584

      #3
      When Sam Peters second in the rankings because of a win over Aguilera (dont try and hype him up) you know theres a problem

      Haye and Povetkin need to man up

      Comment

      • The Dreamer
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 1138
        • 89
        • 106
        • 7,576

        #4
        Originally posted by //-GreatJoe-//
        As Sam Peter put up such a hearty, courageous effort in against Vitali, I cannot wait to see this match.








        !!Sarcasm Alert!!
        As far as I'm concerned getting into the ring and getting beat is far more courageous than not even wanting a fight at all.

        This is gonna be Peter's 3rd fight with a Klitschko. Some people can't even make to the ring with them once

        Comment

        • The Hammer
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 50797
          • 3,416
          • 8,704
          • 58,851

          #5
          Originally posted by The Dreamer
          As far as I'm concerned getting into the ring and getting beat is far more courageous than not even wanting a fight at all.

          This is gonna be Peter's 3rd fight with a Klitschko. Some people can't even make to the ring with them once
          Exactly.

          Props to Sam Peter for having more courage than the two chickens, Povetkin and Haye!

          Comment

          • The Hammer
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 50797
            • 3,416
            • 8,704
            • 58,851

            #6
            Originally posted by //-GreatJoe-//
            Your forgetting the fact that Sam Peter has nothing to lose. He would sign those slave contracts.

            So if he wins, does he have to have a rematch with Vitali?
            There were no "slave contracts" - some people have been lying to cover their COWARDICE.

            The truth: Haye and Povetkin are afraid of the Klitschkos.

            Comment

            • Khalid X
              The Truth *********
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2008
              • 11976
              • 691
              • 531
              • 20,762

              #7
              Originally posted by Freedom Fighter
              Some of the Klitschko haters have been saying that Wlad is handpicking Sam Peter.

              But the fact is, Wlad has been ORDERED by the IBF to fight Peter.

              When the IBF removed Alexander Povetkin's mandatory status, they made IBF #2 Sam Peter the mandatory and ordered Wlad to fight him.
              There is absolutely nothing wrong with the Klitschko's opponent selection. It's not their fault those guys like Haye, Povetkin and Valuev are too pu$$y to get in the ring with them.

              Comment

              • Boxing Scene
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2007
                • 7107
                • 915
                • 1,705
                • 29,819

                #8
                Originally posted by //-GreatJoe-//
                Your forgetting the fact that Sam Peter has nothing to lose. He would sign those slave contracts.


                So if he wins, does he have to have a rematch with Vitali?
                What slave contracts? Are you talking about the slave contract that Sauerland claimed existed with no proof?

                Comment

                • The Hammer
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 50797
                  • 3,416
                  • 8,704
                  • 58,851

                  #9
                  Originally posted by //-GreatJoe-//
                  I think you are being abit ignorant about their contracts.
                  No, I'm not. You are. Why don't you do some careful research before making comments like that?

                  There are NO rematch clauses in a mandatory's contract. Here are Povetkin's objections from an interview in the Russian media:

                  Talk about anything boxing related here. Where the boxing discussion is always Non Stop!

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #10
                    I wish someone would order Haye or Povetkin to grow balls and fight Wlad.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP