Too bad we can only vote for one fighter, I had the bulk of them cleaning the Klitschko's clocks...
What ATG has the biggest chances of KOing a Klitschko?
Collapse
-
Foreman was never knocked down by any of the modern Heavyweights.I skipped to 2:29 and all I saw was Foreman getting wobbled by 6'2'' featherfist Moorer (40%+ KOratio in against 200+ opponents = worse than Chris Byrd) and by 6'2 Morrisson.
If THAT is somehow "your proof" of how Foreman II could withstand a Klitschko who is a head taller than Foreman (6'3.5'') and has a higher KOratio than both Moorer and Morrisson then... you failed.
Ron Lyle and Muhammad Ali did better than, Briggs(88% KO) and Morrison(87% KO).
Wladimir is a weak heavyweight who has the most feather-fisted resume' from 2006-2010 that I have ever seen. 208 lb Chambers, soft Chagaev and Ibragimov, the only two guys with a KO% above 80 was old shot Rahman, and a Brewster who had already been beaten by Serg. Wladimir is a joke of a Heavyweight and would get smashed by 1994 George.Comment
-
Hahaha, thanks for coming out finally!! Don't let anyone know! They might have a death penalty for boys like you in your country.
No wonder that you talk so often about "alts" and no wonder that you had to photoshop a fake beard into the picture so that noone recognizes your face.
Prime Malcom X would clean Wlad's clock.Comment
-
Haha, another self-ownage. You are showing Ali half-naked (or in leather) and talk about "cleaning Wlad's c*ck".
You are soooo obviously gay and having such a crush on Ali. Thank you for finally admitting that you are *different* than most of us here.
And, hey, please: The next time you talk with your elders about your beliefs ALWAYS MENTION WHAT YOU JUST POSTED HERE: "Malcom X would clean Wlad's c*ck"Last edited by knn; 06-09-2010, 04:54 PM.Comment
-
Sure, how could he have been KOed in the 1970ies by 2000s-heavies.
Briggs and Morrisson are still from the pre-wall-fall-era. If it proves anything then a) Tyson's era was featherfistier than Ali's era or b) Foreman's chin got stronger the fatter he got (which is the more probable explanation).
By your definition Tyson (70+% KOratio) is "featherfisted" and a win over Prime Tyson would merely add to the "most feather-fisted resume".Comment
-
Because this is always always always how it goes when someone mentions Wladimir Klitschko. "Ross anyone?", "Sanders anyone?"
And the worst it: These people delude themselves into believing that by mentioning "Sanders anyone?" they have actually *owned* Klitschko fans and won an argument.
Having said that: Mmuham MadaM is the worst CLAYton I have ever witnessed. As soon as she appears the thread goes downhill. I have never seen a gayer, spammier, no-argument-type of poster than her. And I love it. She provided me already with countless quotable sentences that I can use for my anti-CLAYton website.
I will answer your good and lengthy post in a moment.Last edited by knn; 06-09-2010, 05:15 PM.Comment
-
I voted for Iron Mike.........Mike would kill both them kats in less than 6 rounds........but you really should did an "all of the above" choice.......im just saying........Before you vote: Imagine that your LIFE and your PROPERTY would depend on getting it right. If you send in the wrong opponent then you lose your life and property.
Thus choose wisely the one opponent with the greatest chance to KO Wladimir Klitschko without himself getting KOed.
This is a "Time Machine into the Past" match-up (= the current Wladimir Klitschko is being sent back through time to meet the original ATG).
If you think that several can do the job, then of course choose the one with the highest chances.Comment
-
No, because the mafia who holds the revolver at your head ("You gotta tell us whom to send in against Wlad because we will bet on that guy") wants to bet and make money NOW.Comment
Comment