Is Amirh Kahn more of A Match up problem to FLoyd then "Pacman"
Collapse
-
In no way shape or form would i ever say Khan could beat floyd but i do think he could potentially give him problems the jab was great yesterday plus i hate when people compare previous fights to how a different fight with a different opponent would go especially when freddie roach is their trainer, a guy infamous for his gameplans. He said on many occasions that they knew with paulie they could take risks and the gameplan was perfect creating a large distance and then closing in down with the double jab and occasion right hand against mayweather they wouldnt be foolish to try thisComment
-
Seems you are just too butt hurt from last night; Khan wins, Mitch ***** gets ****** out in 3 rounds.
anyway for TS, I think floyd would be able to catch khan lunging in, with counter uppercuts. This is all he would need to to to finish the fight.Comment
-
nothing floyd can't figure out in a round or two. one thing i see khan do is jump in with his punches, particularly with his one-two's. i think floyd puts him down witha check hook.Comment
-
wha do you mean TS?
do you mean Khan-mayweather will be more competitive than pac-mayweather?
or do you mean khan will do better against mayweather than he against pacman?
i've read some of the posts here and most of them thinks you mean it like the first one i've written. but i do understand it like the second one.
and by the way, as a comment to your thread.
that's what i thought also.khan or khan's style and technique will be more competitive against mayweather than against pacman.
pacman will KO khan, that's for sure. and maybe earlier than we thought.
2 to 3 years from maybe i would have changed my mind, but as long as i see khan the way he is right now that would be my statement.
mayweather meanwhile is a very technical fighter. but he's not that much of a puncher. and doesn't finishes his opponent, in a hurry.or trying to push and apply pressure. so i think, khan's jab and overall style would trouble mayweather,
right now he's an easy fight though. he ain't landing over the shoulder roll.Comment
-
wha do you mean TS?
do you mean Khan-mayweather will be more competitive than pac-mayweather?
or do you mean khan will do better against mayweather than he against pacman?
i've read some of the posts here and most of them thinks you mean it like the first one i've written. but i do understand it like the second one.
and by the way, as a comment to your thread.
that's what i thought also.khan or khan's style and technique will be more competitive against mayweather than against pacman.
pacman will KO khan, that's for sure. and maybe earlier than we thought.
2 to 3 years from maybe i would have changed my mind, but as long as i see khan the way he is right now that would be my statement.
mayweather meanwhile is a very technical fighter. but he's not that much of a puncher. and doesn't finishes his opponent, in a hurry.or trying to push and apply pressure. so i think, khan's jab and overall style would trouble mayweather,
right now he's an easy fight though. he ain't landing over the shoulder roll.Comment
-
At the moment no due to lack of experience. He has time. But in general he could cause more problems than Pacquio in the future easily if he improves his fluidity in combinations and marshal a better defence mechanism and possibly throwing punches like Pac in punches with confidence. Anyone who says otherwise has lost the plotComment
-
I said Michell may have bitten off more than he could chew. When I saw the size difference of the two in the ring I was certain he would lose although before then I thought he might just edge it. I give him credit for just t takeing a hard tough competative fight something I have yet to see with Khan.
If you go through my past posts you will see that I said Malignaggi would lose in a late round stoppage or on points. I never saw that as a competative fight so I am not at all " butt hurt" hurt about Khan winning. As for Mitchell at least he had the guts to go for it. Winning is easy if you get fed canned made to measure opponents.Comment
-
This is not a pacqauio hate thread so please spare me your useless attacks and usual clownery
He has longer arms, a very fast and effecient jab and is very fast, a little taller and overall the better boxer in my opinion then pacman, he really has a chance to do great things...he has a suspect chin but floyd aint knockin nobody out at 147 in welter anyways so
is this fight between floyd and amirh a better matchup and potentially a better fight then would be the pacman fight???
Comment
-
When it's funny that the opponent was a top 5 ranked junior welterweight. Far from being a "canned" opponent.I said Michell may have bitten off more than he could chew. When I saw the size difference of the two in the ring I was certain he would lose although before then I thought he might just edge it. I give him credit for just t takeing a hard tough competative fight something I have yet to see with Khan.
If you go through my past posts you will see that I said Malignaggi would lose in a late round stoppage or on points. I never saw that as a competative fight so I am not at all " butt hurt" hurt about Khan winning. As for Mitchell at least he had the guts to go for it. Winning is easy if you get fed canned made to measure opponents.
Khan has had competitive fights in the past with willie limond and gomez.
Khan went out of his comfort zone in new york and dealt with the situation just fine.
fair enough for your other points though. I actually felt sorry for Mitchell, I hope he can come back and win a world title. I hated the way katsidis clowned him before the referee was giving instructions. Katsidis is classless.Comment
Comment