IS potshotting (a 38 year old man) = domination?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • STRUGG
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacey1991
    If he beats him clearly enough to show that he did it convincingly, that to me is dominition in a way and shows that he beat him convincingly, potshotting or not.

    If Floyd wasn't fighting Mosley you would complain saying he is ducking him, so don't bring that bull**** up about his age, Mosley is a great fighter and a very live opponent so ofcourse he has a chance of winning, lets just stop all of this **** and look forward to the big fight.
    clear/convincingly enough............isnt domination..............and age is a factor and inactiveness too............and you know it..........

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacey1991
    replied
    Originally posted by STRUGG
    simple yes or no would be fine............................gracias
    If he beats him clearly enough to show that he did it convincingly, that to me is dominition in a way and shows that he beat him convincingly, potshotting or not.

    If Floyd wasn't fighting Mosley you would complain saying he is ducking him, so don't bring that bull**** up about his age, Mosley is a great fighter and a very live opponent so ofcourse he has a chance of winning, lets just stop all of this **** and look forward to the big fight.

    Leave a comment:


  • STRUGG
    replied
    Originally posted by Clyde Barrow
    If PBF wins 9 rounds by potshotting, then yes it is.
    such low standard............for a self proclaimed GOAT.........wouldnt you say????

    Leave a comment:


  • Clyde Barrow
    replied
    If PBF wins 9 rounds by potshotting, then yes it is.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tamis!
    replied
    Originally posted by STRUGG
    floyd masters............playing it safe.......to dominate you need to take a risk.............................a calculated one.....to showcase the intangibles.............
    ^^^^^ FLoyd stans won't agree though!

    Leave a comment:


  • Grand Champ
    replied
    Originally posted by Walt Liquor
    no it isn't, it's doing the least amount possible to win. here are examples from floyd's career.

    gatti, corrales= domination

    oscar, jmm: doing just enought to win
    Not sure about JMM, but the baldomir fight is a textbook example of just doing enough, avoiding risks.

    Leave a comment:


  • STRUGG
    replied
    Originally posted by PH|L
    It depends, is Pacquiao vs Clottey a domination? if yes, then yes. If no, then no. Its relative really.

    If Floyd wins every rounds, I'll call it a domination. I thought Floyd dominated Marquez, and Pacquiao dominated Clottey.
    fair enough.....................analyzt the circumstances though.............JMM being blown up...........and cheated at the weigh in

    Leave a comment:


  • PH|L
    replied
    It depends, is Pacquiao vs Clottey a domination? if yes, then yes. If no, then no. Its relative really.

    If Floyd wins every rounds, I'll call it a domination. I thought Floyd dominated Marquez, and Pacquiao dominated Clottey.

    Leave a comment:


  • STRUGG
    replied
    Originally posted by Tamis_Siensya
    Sorry mate can't answer a simple yes or no lol.

    DOMINATION - n.

    Control or power over another or others.
    The exercise of such control or power.

    Floyd might control the game.
    Floyd, historically, doesn't flaunt his power, but he's braggin' about using it fightnite we don't know.

    So it's a toss up.



    floyd masters............playing it safe.......to dominate you need to take a risk.............................a calculated one.....to showcase the intangibles.............

    Leave a comment:


  • Walt Liquor
    replied
    no it isn't, it's doing the least amount possible to win. here are examples from floyd's career.

    gatti, corrales= domination

    oscar, jmm: doing just enought to win

    Leave a comment:

Working...
TOP