IS potshotting (a 38 year old man) = domination?

[STRUGG]

Could have went lower and ducked Shane like Pac did .

go find a pac hate thread to bump......lol.........GTFO off mine

[STRUGG]

Sure, if you say so.

Clearly you are misunderstood, I said if he does it effectively enough to show that he clearly won convincingly then to me that is domination, you asked my opinion, I gave it to you. If Floyd does it effective enough to beat Shane convincingly, then that shows that Shane couldn't do enough to be the dominant one in the fight, hence Floyd would have dominated.

Its funny cause you **** on everything Floyd does, if he took a crap you would too. If he wasn't fighting Shane you would be crying and complaining, so don't give me any of that ****, just be happy that a big fight is happening.

Your just saying it so if Floyd wins, you can just say "well Shane is 38 years old, hes been off for a while, Floyd was supposed to win this means nothing!" and if Shane wins it will be "ahahaha, Floyd lost to a 38 year old man who hasn't had a fight in a while, Floyd has proven to be a bum", your just trying to make ready made excuses to **** on Floyd, win or lose... and you know it.

you are clearly on your "off day".....as a floyd fan.......lol.....z bit overlydefensive.............and *****like.............

[STRUGG]

In a straight up 12 round fight with no KD's or deductions

7-5 for the winner is a close win
8-4 for the winner is a competitive win
9-3 or more for the winner is domination

The style in which the guy fights pertains to entertainment value, but has nothing to do with whether or not he deserves credit for the victory. If PBF potshots all night and that's good enough for him to win 9 rounds, boring or not, that means he dominated Shane. Period.

NO just no if 9-3 against a 38 year old is domination......what do you call the gatti and chico performance then????

[Reloaded]

such low standard............for a self proclaimed GOAT.........wouldnt you say????

Could have went lower and ducked Shane like Pac did .

[Spacey1991]

clear/convincingly enough............isnt domination..............and age is a factor and inactiveness too............and you know it..........

Sure, if you say so.

Clearly you are misunderstood, I said if he does it effectively enough to show that he clearly won convincingly then to me that is domination, you asked my opinion, I gave it to you. If Floyd does it effective enough to beat Shane convincingly, then that shows that Shane couldn't do enough to be the dominant one in the fight, hence Floyd would have dominated, whether or not you like that style is irrelevant.

Its funny cause you **** on everything Floyd does, if he took a crap you would too. If he wasn't fighting Shane you would be crying and complaining, so don't give me any of that ****, just be happy that a big fight is happening.

Your just saying it so if Floyd wins, you can just say "well Shane is 38 years old, hes been off for a while, Floyd was supposed to win this means nothing!" and if Shane wins it will be "ahahaha, Floyd lost to a 38 year old man who hasn't had a fight in a while, Floyd has proven to be a bum", your just trying to make ready made excuses to **** on Floyd, win or lose... and you know it.

[STRUGG]

Shane Mosley is...

#1 at Welterweight

#3 at P4P Rankings

That's all needs to be said.

Like someone said before, if Floyd wins 9 rounds or more it is domination against an ATG Fighter.

TS doesn't like Floyd Mayweather, if you look at his previous threads you can clearly see that, so he will discredit Floyd no matter what, he wants Floyd to lose badly, and if Floyd doesn't he wants to discredit the wins.

is shane not 38..............is he not been inactive..............if floyd wins 9 out of 3 by potshotting an old ATG........its a 4/10 at best.....how can you say i will discredit floyd no matter what???..........when id surely give him his props if he "DOMINATES" an old ATG...........

[jpeck]

haha if this is what you mean by "potshotting", then I'd have to say yes!

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=potshotting

1. potshot 6 up, 21 down
The difficult art of jizzing in somebody's face when the lights are out.

Extra points are awarded if the result is still there when they wake up.

It is called a potshot because darkness causes inaccuracy in most cases
*Wakes up*
"Who the **** has potshotted me?!"

[Parody]

Shane Mosley is...

#1 at Welterweight

#3 at P4P Rankings

That's all needs to be said.

Like someone said before, if Floyd wins 9 rounds or more it is domination against an ATG Fighter.

TS doesn't like Floyd Mayweather, if you look at his previous threads you can clearly see that, so he will discredit Floyd no matter what, he wants Floyd to lose badly, and if Floyd doesn't he wants to discredit the wins.

[Clyde Barrow]

such low standard............for a self proclaimed GOAT.........wouldnt you say????

In a straight up 12 round fight with no KD's or deductions

7-5 for the winner is a close win
8-4 for the winner is a competitive win
9-3 or more for the winner is domination

The style in which the guy fights pertains to entertainment value, but has nothing to do with whether or not he deserves credit for the victory. If PBF potshots all night and that's good enough for him to win 9 rounds, boring or not, that means he dominated Shane. Period.

[craigus1990]

yes, potshotting is a tactic.. if thats what will work then it works..