Why Pacquiao Isn't That Great

[whirlwind]

GREAT POST! This is exactly why I'm not a fan of Manny. Claiming to have a great resume while beating past prime, shot, or weight drained opponents. All while probably being roided up.

And that's why Floyd is greater right?

[Empecherado]

Dawg, look at yourself. You spent your lonely Thursday night in your mothers basement trying to convince boxing fans Pacquaio is not that great.

We have Mayweather vs. Sugar Shane Mosley coming up, and you took the time to write this bullshyt essay? About who? Manny Pacquaio.

Now go kill yourself. Nobody gives a shyt about what you think. Nothings worse than an Undercover *****.

Lol, damn. Who moderates these posts? Anyhow, your post has more hate than mine, which is what I’m sure you’d label my initial post as. I don’t care.

Ya, he's really not that great.

Lol, maybe I should have titled my thread differently because basically all your doing is arguing that phrase, and not everything else I said regarding the fighters he’s fought being more names then actual threats when he fought them.

Yeah ok, thanks for posting.

Lol, sorry if I hurt your feelings on that thread you started. It was my intention.

sorry, but i'm getting tired of all these "i'm a big fan of so and so, but guess what! imma just rip his entire resume apart, piss on his biggest wins, call him a roider coz some other fighter couldn't do what he did (which weren't supposed to be phenomenal anyway since his opponents were either old, weight drained, not at best weight!), and there's nothing you can do about it because i'm not biased! why? because i just said i was a fan of that guy!!!"

grow some balls and man up bro. i mean come the fck on, if you don't really like a certain fighter, you don't have to kiss his feet or anything, but at least have some dignity and not act like some masquerading chick.

it's normal to not like certain fighters for whatever reason but at least be vocal about how you really feel mang. this is what this forum is about and it's not like someone is gonna cut your balls off or kill your entire family just for talking **** about a certain fighter (actually, some would, but they can't).

so yes, please, enough with all the "i'm a fan of" bull****... it's getting really pathetic.

Actually, I was a huge fan of Pacquiao like I mentioned and I still am a fan, what boxing fan isn’t a fan of Pacquiao? I still enjoy watching him fight. I just got way turned-off with all his and Roach’s BS excuses as to why they won’t take the tests and all the *******s just keep making it harder and harder for people to really like him, and I just think he’s been matched perfectly and I don’t tend to overrate him as the majority of people do and I’m not obligated too. By Roach’s own submission, they didn’t take the Mosley fight because “he (Mosley) is too good.” What does that tell you about what they thought of the opponents he (Manny) did face? No threats. The only two fights they probably gambled with was the first Barrera fight and the second Marquez fight (and possibly the first one) thinking he was way past it for the second fight, and I have Manny going 1 and 2 in those 3 fights.

you are way to critical. if u dont want to give Pac props, u are probably the only one. you cant discredit his every win, thats just wrong

It’s not wrong.

[ummeed]

Actually, I was a huge fan of Pacquiao like I mentioned and I still am a fan, what boxing fan isn’t a fan of Pacquiao? I still enjoy watching him fight. I just got way turned-off with all his and Roach’s BS excuses as to why they won’t take the tests and all the *******s just keep making it harder and harder for people to really like him, and I just think he’s been matched perfectly and I don’t tend to overrate him as the majority of people do and I’m not obligated too. By Roach’s own submission, they didn’t take the Mosley fight because “he (Mosley) is too good.” What does that tell you about what they thought of the opponents he (Manny) did face? No threats. The only two fights they probably gambled with was the first Barrera fight and the second Marquez fight (and possibly the first one) thinking he was way past it for the second fight, and I have Manny going 1 and 2 in those 3 fights.

i may be arguing semantics but to be a fan of someone isn't the first step to like him (in your case, to at least not hate his guts)? have you even read your own posts buddy? you find it real hard to give him credit on his wins, you can blame roach as much as you want on some recent fights because of the statements he made, but just looking at the entirety of your posts (particularly some of the highlighted parts), you are downplaying his wins (albeit maybe subconsciously) to the extent of even trying to telepathically read their minds like in the case of why they fought jmm again (team pac actually wanted a rematch right after the first fight but jmm's team declined).

look, i'm not here to argue your points (coz honestly, posts like these have been beaten to death and just about anyone can pick apart any boxer's resume if they look real hard (and have enough hate?) to find flaws), i'm here to call you out on your inclusion of the word "fan" in your posts.

no sir, you are not obligated to do **** like "overrating" anyone or anything. in fact some people here even share your mindset about pac, like that flexxx guy, but not alot go out of their way and go thru all the trouble and call themselves a fan of pac just to gain credibility.

you are not a fan.

[Empecherado]

What about some cliffs?

Here you go

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=384942