Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Funeka vs. Guzman Once Again in Doubt Due To The IBF?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Funeka vs. Guzman Once Again in Doubt Due To The IBF?

    BoxingScene.com was advised by Gary Shaw, promoter for Ali Funeka (30-2-3, 25 KOs), that his fighter's rematch with Joan Guzman (29-0-1, 17 KOs), scheduled for tomorrow night at the Hard Rock in Las Vegas, is once again in jeopardy. As I previously reported, Guzman was nine-pounds above the lightweight limit. He weighed 144-pounds, while Funeka was at the limit at 135. An agreement was reached between both sides to hold a second weigh-in at 7am. Pursuant to the agreement, Guzman is not allowed to weigh above 150-pounds and Funeka is unable to weigh more than 145-pounds. The vacant IBF title can only be won by Funeka. If Guzman wins, the title remains vacant. [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    I feel sorry for Funeka. I hope Guzman's career is ruined.

    Comment


    • #3
      If the fight goes through I hope Funeka puts Guzman in the hospital.

      Comment


      • #4
        2 times already **** this clown

        Comment


        • #5
          I feel sorry for Funeka also. This is the 3rd time he has been ****ed over. This is the 2nd time Guzman has done this.
          Sad ****

          Comment


          • #6
            Funeka did everything that was required of him and should just be named interim champ no matter what I think, he really already beat Guzman and now something happened that was totally beyond his sphere of control.

            Comment


            • #7
              *** guzman he should never ever be on tv again

              Comment


              • #8
                This **** would've never happened if they just gave Funeka the decision that he deserved over that bum in the first place.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Guzman should have to fight Maidana

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    What the **** is the IBF's problem?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP