Is There Any Mex/Latinos Boxers More Accomplished Than DLH???

[catalinul]

This is about Mex & Latinos. TYVM.

Rosario isn't better in my opinion.

It wa an answer to one of you're questions about which fighters beat which.

[MonsieurGeorges]

You'd have DLH above Tito, even though they mostly fought the same people and Tito did better against all of them?

yes I would

[Mr. Fantastic]

On paper?

Nobody I guess. You're correct

Ok on Paper........so could you honestly say other fighters have accomplished more based on favortism from fans?? Their hate for Oscar??

[jrosales13]

Sort of like Pac only fighting one style of fighter right??

If he's so overrated then ANSWER THE QUESTION. WHO HAS ACCOMPLISHED MORE AS A MEX/LATINO THAN DLH???

How is what I said the same thing as Pac? Explain please...

I would say this is easier to win more titles when you have more weight-class and more belts around... So you have to put that into account when you compare him to the Hispanic from 30 or more years ago...

I can tell you who is great... And, a lot of people already named them... Duran, Chavez, Olivares, Finito Lopez, Ortiz, Gomez, Napoles, Arguello, Locche, Canto.... Just to name a few all these are greater than Oscar... Again most of them might not have the "accomplishment" cuz they didn't have the WBO belt in there era for instance. But, they're greater fighters...

[Mr. Fantastic]

Id say among multiple others Julio Cesar Chavez will be remembered as a greater fighter. He held six world titles in three wieght divisions, went undefeated in his first 93 bouts, He held the most successful defenses of a title (27) and most title fights (37).

6 world titles in 3 weight divisions isn't greater than 10 and in 6.
How many of those 93 were a really good??

[Clegg]

Ok so you go off a win or 2. But on accomplishments.........did they ever beat 17 world champions?? Do they have belts in 6 divisions?? 10 time world champions??

Tito didn't destroy Vargas. Mosley destroyed Vargas.

So just cause Morales beat 2 guys he's accomplished more? lmao!!!

I see now why there are several users who talk about you being an idiot and have sigs dedicated to you.

If you want to make an argument, do so. Typically, if someone is lacking in knowledge, they'll make a statement and then challenge others to explain why they are wrong, rather than actually evaluating the topic at hand in an intelligent fashion.

The fact is that both MAB and EM beat better boxers than Oscar did. I provided two examples, but I'm not going to go through every win on their resumes.

The list of names that Oscar beat is not as impressive as the list of names that Barrera and Morales beat. You wanna disagree, state your case. But don't make a ******ed comment without defending it, then sit there saying "lamo!!!111" when someone points out that you're wrong.

[Mr. Fantastic]

How is what I said the same thing as Pac? Explain please...

I would say this is easier to win more titles when you have more weight-class and more belts around... So you have to put that into account when you compare him to the Hispanic from 30 or more years ago...

I can tell you who is great... And, a lot of people already named them... Duran, Chavez, Olivares, Finito Lopez, Ortiz, Gomez, Napoles, Arguello, Locche, Canto.... Just to name a few all these are greater than Oscar... Again most of them might not have the "accomplishment" cuz they didn't have the WBO belt in there era for instance. But, they're greater fighters...

They are better fighters based on your hate for Oscar lol.
Funny how a boxer who you don't like accomplished something the guys you named didn't do. Believe me, I'm a big Chavez, Finito, Gomez fan but they don't touch Oscar. They are great in their own way though.

[MonsieurGeorges]

Ok on Paper........so could you honestly say other fighters have accomplished more based on favortism from fans?? Their hate for Oscar??

No I agree with you. My own personal opinion would be different, but that's my own personal opinion. I guess I'm saying other fighters have accomplished more based on favoritism from myself. I'm always going to put Duran first because he is probably my favorite boxer of all time. But If I had to be unbiased I agree that the records say Oscar accomplished more. Does that make him better? I don't know

But all in all in agree. Accomplishments aside, prime Oscar is a way more complete fighter than Trinidad

[Walt Liquor]

Duran
Monzon
Chavez
Arguello
Jofre
Gavilan
Olivares
Napoles
Gomez
Ortiz
Benitez
Zarate
Locche

thank you!!!!!!!!! good lord this is another dumbnsb thread.

[MonsieurGeorges]

I see now why there are several users who talk about you being an idiot and have sigs dedicated to you.

If you want to make an argument, do so. Typically, if someone is lacking in knowledge, they'll make a statement and then challenge others to explain why they are wrong, rather than actually evaluating the topic at hand in an intelligent fashion.

The fact is that both MAB and EM beat better boxers than Oscar did. I provided two examples, but I'm not going to go through every win on their resumes.

The list of names that Oscar beat is not as impressive as the list of names that Barrera and Morales beat. You wanna disagree, state your case. But don't make a ******ed comment without defending it, then sit there saying "lamo!!!111" when someone points out that you're wrong.

I hear what you're saying too man. Both of you make good points