Then why should Chad get props for beating him? I'm confused. I thought that you guys keep saying that Johnson looked over the hill against Daniel Judah. Now even some people who like Glen Johnson are saying that too. If Johnson is as gone as people say he is, then it's time for Dawson to fight someone under the age of 40 like people say he should. And that means not calling out the Hopkins-Jones winner.
Personally, myself, I don't even know what people are talking about when they say that Johnson looked unimpressive against Daniel Judah. He showed better stamina and threw more punches than Dawson did in both of his fights with Tarver. So if Dawson actually beats Johnson convincingly in this rematch, I don't see any way I don't give him credit.
Personally, myself, I don't even know what people are talking about when they say that Johnson looked unimpressive against Daniel Judah. He showed better stamina and threw more punches than Dawson did in both of his fights with Tarver. So if Dawson actually beats Johnson convincingly in this rematch, I don't see any way I don't give him credit.
Comment