Comments Thread For: Examining the scorecards of legends ? and explaining how they could ?steal? decisions

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BoxingUpdates
    Administrator
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2024
    • 11857
    • 243
    • 0
    • 0

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Examining the scorecards of legends ? and explaining how they could ?steal? decisions

    Boxing judge Tom Schreck explains why it's important to focus purely on the boxing when scoring the fights of legends
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Smash
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Nov 2008
    • 16074
    • 6,528
    • 7,922
    • 21,172

    #2
    Greatness takes care of itself.
    It doesn’t require help from a judge’s scorecard.


    oh yes it does lol

    have u seen the crappy home guy a side decisions that get rolled out over and over again led by the likes of addy byrd and the loonies?

    Comment

    • Tag, You're Hit
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2021
      • 1024
      • 1,000
      • 818
      • 0

      #3
      "Leonard vs. Hagler

      Leonard stole moments; Hagler won minutes."

      I believe you and I are in the same camp on the outcome that SHOULD have been on that one, Mr. Schreck.

      I saw the fight easily for Hagler, who I felt dominated the second half of the fight by clearly landing the harder, cleaner, more effective and more frequent punches. I think you really need to have a soft spot to score the fight to Sugar Ray. Here is how I scored the fight:

      Hagler: 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
      Leonard: 1, 2, 3, 4

      I could see round 6 going either way (but rounds 2 & 3 were close too). And while Leonard did some nice work in other rounds, particularly 9 (best/most exciting round of the fight), 11 & 12, Hagler clearly won those rounds in my opinion.

      And Judge Jose Juan Guerra was either corrupt in scoring that fight or was a complete imbecile. I go with the former.​

      Comment

      • SteveM
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 8465
        • 2,360
        • 1,232
        • 35,733

        #4
        Not covered here is favouritism to 'The'Great' who as well as being great is also the one who enables great fight nights to occur because they are so popular and can fill out a arena/stadium/casino.
        Referees and Judges get paid more for those bouts. The boxers, promoters, stadium/casino owners and tv networks all make more money. It's hard and unpopular work to score a fight the way Tom describes above - so much easier, and better for nearly everyone, to award all the close rounds to the legend.
        And never mind even legends. Just a regular A side fighter gets preferential treatment viz-a-viz Callum Simpson ths past Saturday night who somehow was up on the cards with his flurries of pitter-patter punches. Or for complete favouratism consider Jose Ramirez vs Mauricio Herrera from 7-8 years ago - complete robbery.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP