Comments Thread For: BoxingScene?s Midweek Mailbag: Your takes on Crawford beating Canelo

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BoxingUpdates
    Administrator
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2024
    • 10395
    • 232
    • 0
    • 0

    #1

    Comments Thread For: BoxingScene?s Midweek Mailbag: Your takes on Crawford beating Canelo

    In this week?s mailbag, we tackle your thoughts on what Terence Crawford?s big win means for his career, and what the loss means for Canelo Alvarez?s.?
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • felinoboxing
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Feb 2022
    • 33
    • 5
    • 0
    • 0

    #2
    SNAC is the present of physical preparation. All boxers should see Victor Conte. Everything is fine with Victor. His past conviction for supplying prohibited substances (see the Balco case) is in the past. He recently said he knows how to pass the VADA test, but don't worry, Conte is a changed man. Just learn all the secrets.

    Comment

    • CPNUTKnockoutFreshMart
      Freshest FreshMart
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2012
      • 3933
      • 3,133
      • 9,792
      • 6,012

      #3
      I don't agree that Inoue is #3 P4P . I still have him at #1 using the original meaning of P4P. If they were the same size would Usyk or Crawford great as they are beat Inoue ? I say no.
      I can't imagine Crawford fighting either of the Charlos , not where they are currently in their careers. Some years ago it could have made sense , but now ? No way , Crawford is in a different universe than they are . To be honest , Crawford has no peers among his peers. Benavidez and Sheeraz are huge guys compared to him so I don't think those are good fights for anyone coming up in weight even though168 looked natural on him.
      ​​​​​ As far as Walsh goes , I agree with Malvado , Walsh is not going to get to the top at 154 or any other weight class. He's ok but just not good enough for the top level, nor will he be ever. He just isn't that caliber of fighter. He can make some good money being Danas pet boxer but that's about it.
      Last edited by CPNUTKnockoutFreshMart; Today, 02:50 PM.

      Comment

      • The D3vil
        WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF/Lineal
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2016
        • 6142
        • 1,542
        • 1,357
        • 56,286

        #4
        Originally posted by CPNUTKnockoutFreshMart
        I don't agree that Inoue is #3 P4P . I still have him at #1 using the original meaning of P4P. If they were the same size would Usyk or Crawford great as they are beat Inoue ? I say no.
        I can't imagine Crawford fighting either of the Charlos , not where they are currently in their careers. Some years ago it could have made sense , but now ? No way , Crawford is in a different universe than they are . To be honest , Crawford has no peers among his peers. Benavidez and Sheeraz are huge guys compared to him so I don't think those are good fights for anyone coming up in weight even though168 looked natural on him.
        ​​​ As far as Walsh goes , I agree with Malvado , Walsh is not going to get to the top at 154 or any other weight class. He's ok but just not good enough for the top level, nor will he be ever. He just isn't that caliber of fighter. He can make some good money being Danas pet boxer but that's about it.
        Inoue just got knocked down by a cab driver, bro.

        Inoue has shown that he can be hit, hurt, & knocked down even by lesser talent.

        Hell, if Nonito Donaire was just a little bit younger, he might've handed Monster his first loss.

        He's a top 3 fighter in the world, but Crawford & Usyk are both a lot less vulnerable than he is

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP