Comments Thread For: Judge Tom Schreck: But How Do You Really Score a Round?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BoxingUpdates
    Administrator
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2024
    • 11125
    • 240
    • 0
    • 0

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Judge Tom Schreck: But How Do You Really Score a Round?

    Judge Tom Schreck explains his process for deciding which of the two boxers has won a particular round.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • PittyPat
    Kin yer taste the blood?!
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 11197
    • 702
    • 443
    • 28,773

    #2
    If Fighter A is winning a round in decisive or excessive decisive fashion but then suffers a knockdown, that doesn’t automatically make it a 10-8 for Fighter B. That might still be a 10-9 round
    Which sucks. A knockdown should be a hard cause for 10–8, no matter what.

    Comment

    • felinoboxing
      Up and Comer
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Feb 2022
      • 46
      • 8
      • 0
      • 0

      #3
      I don't speak English. Hagler won that tenth round 10-9, between moderate and decisive. I have about 500 fights listed on my boxrec profile. I do it like this: I see how good the punch is and how much damage it does. I give each one a score from 1 to 5. And I add and subtract, until I end up with a number somewhere in the middle. I've compared my scores with the official ones, and they're pretty good.

      Comment

      • felinoboxing
        Up and Comer
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Feb 2022
        • 46
        • 8
        • 0
        • 0

        #4
        And I add and subtract, until I end up with a number somewhere in the middle. I've compared my scores with the official ones, and they're pretty good.

        Comment

        • MulaKO
          Zero F@cks Given
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2007
          • 26806
          • 6,741
          • 6,056
          • 221,421

          #5
          Originally posted by PittyPat

          Which sucks. A knockdown should be a hard cause for 10–8, no matter what.
          What about if it’s a flash knockdown ???
          How would you support that being labeled as a 10/8 round

          Comment

          • PittyPat
            Kin yer taste the blood?!
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2009
            • 11197
            • 702
            • 443
            • 28,773

            #6
            Originally posted by MulaKO
            What about if it’s a flash knockdown ???
            How would you support that being labeled as a 10/8 round
            Because they've (officially) hit the canvas. Simple.

            Comment

            • MulaKO
              Zero F@cks Given
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2007
              • 26806
              • 6,741
              • 6,056
              • 221,421

              #7
              Originally posted by PittyPat

              Because they've (officially) hit the canvas. Simple.
              So the guy who dominates the round but gets knocked down ( flash knockdown ) gets a 10/8 the other way around
              smfh

              Comment

              • JeBron Lamez
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2023
                • 1533
                • 953
                • 1,026
                • 0

                #8
                Originally posted by MulaKO

                So the guy who dominates the round but gets knocked down ( flash knockdown ) gets a 10/8 the other way around
                Yes, as he should.

                Suffering a knockdown without scoring one renders all previous work in a round irrelevant, just like suffering a knockout renders all previous work in a fight irrelevant.​

                Comment

                • MulaKO
                  Zero F@cks Given
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 26806
                  • 6,741
                  • 6,056
                  • 221,421

                  #9
                  Originally posted by JeBron Lamez

                  Yes, as he should.

                  Suffering a knockdown without scoring one renders all previous work in a round irrelevant, just like suffering a knockout renders all previous work in a fight irrelevant.​
                  And then you ask what is wrong with boxing

                  Comment

                  • SteveM
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 8379
                    • 2,335
                    • 1,220
                    • 35,733

                    #10
                    Originally posted by PittyPat

                    Which sucks. A knockdown should be a hard cause for 10–8, no matter what.
                    Not really. Why? There's light knockdowns such as loss of balance and touching glove and heavy knockdowns - ie Fury in first Wilder fight - I see them completely differently - but for the knocked down fighter to only suffer a 1 point deduction he had better be doing damage the rest of the round.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP