Comments Thread For: The Manny, Manny Hall of Fame-worthy sides of Pacquiao

[djtmal]

Come on pac win over thurman at 40 years of age is better than anything floyd did..Floyd fighting YouTubers at same age

Thurman called Floyd out. Floyd wouldn't mention Thurman's name.

Thurman was in his prime you know Floyd wasn't going anywhere near that.

[BodyBagz]

Thurman called Floyd out. Floyd wouldn't mention Thurman's name.

Thurman was in his prime you know Floyd wasn't going anywhere near that.

May beat the man who beat that man, so.......

[BodyBagz]

Yeah right he's losing quarts of blood getting a tattoo.

Floyd was scared he just didn't want to admit it to you.

In what scenario would Pac be losing quarts of blood
????????

[djtmal]

May beat the man who beat that man, so.......

He was scared of losing to Thurman so he didn't utter Thurman's name, even though Thurman was calling him out.

This what Floyd do he retire or go on vacation to duck the whole division, then fight the shopworn guy with a name and say he the best ever

[djtmal]

May beat the man who beat that man, so.......

He beat Judah who lost to Baldimir, so

[IronDanHamza]

Pacquiao was the one who was supposedly scared of needles. Even though he had tattoos.

Pacquaio never once said he was scared of needles.

[Plick647]

Ummmm.... Why? What about anything going forward erases what someone has already accomplished? All of a sudden, is Tyson no longer the youngest man to win the HW championship because he fought Paul? Does Larry Homes career get erased because he fought as a shell of himself late in life?

I worry about this sport's fandom sometimes.

in order to be in the HOF you have to be retired for what, 3 years?
hes about to fight again, so yes, Null and Void!

[hugh grant]

May beat Pac, doe

Lol.
So by your logic if 38 year old RJJ beats 36 year old Duran. then at 40 years old Duran beats Ali? Rjj beating duran is better than duran beating Ali, as RJ J best the man who best the man?
Ok, then if you say so. I'll remember that in future

[landotter]

in order to be in the HOF you have to be retired for what, 3 years?
hes about to fight again, so yes, Null and Void!

Oh stop it. You know better, and nothing is "null and void" . The Boxing Hall of Fame does not remove people for becoming active again. Once they are in, they are in. Pacquiao going into the Hall for what he has accomplished will not be affected by his dumb decisions to fight again if he does. Now you can take the position it should and give your opinion on what should happen, but reality is what we live in. Everything he does going forward will be as a Hall of Famer.

[SUBZER0ED]

Even the true greats get crapped on by haters. If Pacquiao could walk on water, someone out there would say, "Yeah, but if he were truly special, his feet wouldn't have gotten wet!"