Originally posted by sweetlover1988
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Artur Beterbiev unifies light heavyweight titles after brilliant fight with Dmitry Bivol
Collapse
-
BrankoB sweetlover1988 like this.
- Likes 2
-
Originally posted by pnut901 View Post
I think that it's because people see everything in black and white while missing the gray. People want to be right , for some it's almost a need. It was a close fight and a reasonable argument could be made for either guy deserving the nod in my opinion. I was pulling for Beterbiev but I don't think that it's at all unreasonable to believe that Bivol won. I didn't score it while watching it , but at the end I really wasn't expecting Artur to get the decision.
Im all for the rematch. Bivol deserves it and as you said it couldve easily been 115-113 for him. Any 116-112 or 117-113 for either of them is suspect IMO.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sweetlover1988 View Post
Even though I thought Beterbiev won 115-113, I really thought the judge would give it to Bivol (especially when I heard the UD). It was a weird fight tbh... very technical and wasnt really fan friendly. Not much happened but once again, were talking about 2 guys that are P4P top 10.
Im all for the rematch. Bivol deserves it and as you said it couldve easily been 115-113 for him. Any 116-112 or 117-113 for either of them is suspect IMO.- Bivol resigning to fight Beterbiev's fight because Artur wouldn't leave him an inch to fight his...
- Beterbiev able to apply pressure like he usually does but unable to land the mighty overhand right cleanly ...
- Bivol's ability to evade the ropes at any time. I remember maybe 2 instances where Beterbiev was actually able to do his usual Body-Body-Head combos leaning on the ropes...
- Beterbiev suffocating pressure and activity...
- Bivol over-par defense not letting much go through but still getting painted from blocking the shots...
- Most of all, the lowest landing % ever from Beterbiev was enough to be on par Bivol's actual landing shots count...
Last edited by Superbee; 10-13-2024, 11:31 AM.sweetlover1988 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Superbee View Post
A lot actually happened IMO ...- Bivol resigning to fight Beterbiev's fight because Artur wouldn't leave him an inch to fight his...
- Beterbiev able to apply pressure like he usually does but unable to land the mighty overhand right cleanly ...
- Bivol's ability to evade the ropes at any time. I remember maybe 2 instances where Beterbiev was actually able to do his usual Body-Body-Head combos leaning on the ropes...
- Beterbiev suffocating pressure and activity...
- Bivol over-par defense not letting much go through but still getting painted from blocking the shots...
- Most of all, the lowest landing % ever from Beterbiev was enough to be on par Bivol's actual landing shots count...
But Beterbiev showed up in the championship rounds, Bivol hasnt. Im looking forward a rematch -- Bivol deserves it.
I had Beterbiev 115-113 btw but pretty much everyone with me beside one guy that had it a draw thought Bivol won. Bivol will be mad at himself when he see that all he had to do was to win 1 round out of the last 3 for a draw.
Cant blame him though... those body shots from Beterbiev started to show.Last edited by sweetlover1988; 10-13-2024, 12:18 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheOneAboveAll View Post
Any fan with the capacity for rational thought understands that, once again, the problem with boxing isn't the judges, but rather the inane scoring system which poses four competing scoring criteria. These scoring criteria are not officially prioritized, so this allows scorers to pick and choose which criterion they want to emphasize and give primacy to while deprioritizing or outright dismissing the other criteria. Any thinking fan (even a rank noob) can understand how this would be problematic to fair and reasonable scoring. Among many obvious problems, the 4-criteria judging system allows scorers to adapt the scoring to their favorite fighter's style. If their fighter is a big puncher they would focus on heavy landed shots (as they should), but if their fighter is Jamaine Ortiz then they would likely prioritize the scoring of defense or ring generalship (the dumbest, vaguest criteria of all).
No other competitive sport does what boxing does. Imagine if basketball had a scoring system with four competing scoring criteria (points scored, defense, aggressiveness and floor management (aka ring generalship)? We could see winning teams who actually score less points win a world championship because they played like the Globetrotters. That would be ridiculous, but that's precisely what happens with boxing. Fix the dumb scoring system. The one and only scoring criteria that matters is Clean, Hard Punching. Everything else is incidental to this.
Bonus Suggestions: 1. Promote scoring even rounds for even rounds, instead of forcing a 10-9 round (what a concept) 2. Get rid of the arbitrary 10-pt must system.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pnut901 View Post
I think that it's because people see everything in black and white while missing the gray. People want to be right , for some it's almost a need. It was a close fight and a reasonable argument could be made for either guy deserving the nod in my opinion. I was pulling for Beterbiev but I don't think that it's at all unreasonable to believe that Bivol won. I didn't score it while watching it , but at the end I really wasn't expecting Artur to get the decision.pnut901 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Comment