Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Tim Tszyu vs. Keith Thurman: PBC on Prime PPV Official For March 30

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • factsarenice
    replied
    Originally posted by Buzzbron View Post
    I think this appalling bad PPV makes it crystal clear Amazon is pay no money for licensing fees to PBC
    Buzzbron wrote, "I think this appalling bad PPV makes it crystal clear Amazon is pay no money for licensing fees to PBC"
    This man sees the forest amongst the trees, unfortunately the 10 pages of posts before him still havent figured it out. If this is Amazon's grand boxing debut, boxing is in trouble and may cease to exist as a legitimate sport.
    Last edited by factsarenice; 01-26-2024, 10:38 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tag, You're Hit
    replied
    Originally posted by dan-b View Post

    I think if Tszyu were to lose a fight at the 154lb limit the title would become vacant. There may be another reason, I might look at the rules when I can stomach negotiating the WBO's horrible website.
    If you can stomach it, let me know what you find out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr WorldWide
    replied
    Originally posted by Oldskoolg View Post
    210 comments, PBC showing it’s reach with the announcing of just one card lol
    No surprise though.PBC are like Xmas, they turn up one day a year.

    Everyone is into it before the event and a week later they are broke with nothing memorable to show for it.







    Just jokes bro
    Last edited by Mr WorldWide; 01-26-2024, 10:00 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • El_Mero
    replied
    Originally posted by dan-b View Post

    The article says it's a non-title fight. Always worth reading before firing off a lot of comments.
    Even worse then. No voluntary defense? Weak fight. Hope Timmy khtfo quick

    Leave a comment:


  • Oldskoolg
    replied
    210 comments, PBC showing it’s reach with the announcing of just one card lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Oldskoolg
    replied
    Originally posted by TrickOrSkeet34 View Post

    You can flippantly chalk it up to emotional PBC haters, but it rings hollow when we’re looking at the 1st fight card under the Amazon banner. That’s bound to be under the microscope & get some scrutiny. So far we’ve got the same formula just with a different platform—C+ fight card going on PPV in an attempt to meet illogical purse demands. If Amazon starts footing the bill for cards then we’ll have a better idea of their commitment to boxing.
    Talk about your feelings, lay down on the sofa, and let’s talk about this whole c+ business. I am here to listen….

    Leave a comment:


  • Oldskoolg
    replied
    Originally posted by MulaKO View Post

    It’s not hard to not like PBC
    Same chit with Slow Eddie
    These guys just love the attention and they’ll get it any way possible , whether good or bad
    Eddie love the attention, Haymon we have never even heard him utter a word….two figures who couldn’t be more diametrically polar opposite

    Leave a comment:


  • El_Maldito_Rey
    replied
    Originally posted by famicommander View Post

    It raises Tim's profile and Keith has the best pedigree of anybody he's faced. He's been inactive for sure but Thurman has fought Jan Zaveck, Julio Diaz, Robert Guerrero, Luis Collazo, Shawn Porter, Danny Garcia, and Manny Pacquiao among others. His only loss was a split decision to Pac on a 1st round flash knockdown.

    To this point the biggest names on Tim's resume are Tony Harrison and Jeff Horn. If Tim can't get Charlo or Crawford next, Thurman is a good fight for him. If Tim can be the first to stop him that's a good notch on his belt and puts him in a better position to headline a PPV against Crawford or Charlo down the line.
    So wait, I thought the narrative around here was that it was bad to drag someone up in weigh classes, that it was bad to fight someone that hadn't fought in 2 years, that it was bad to fight 35 year olds because they were old and shot, that it was bad to fight at 155 lb catch weights, that it was bad to fight non title fights.

    This is good fight now? That will elevate someone's profile? What changed? Are people hypocrites? or are good/bad fights determined on skin color and who's promoting?

    Leave a comment:


  • JJ75JJ
    replied
    Originally posted by famicommander View Post

    It raises Tim's profile and Keith has the best pedigree of anybody he's faced. He's been inactive for sure but Thurman has fought Jan Zaveck, Julio Diaz, Robert Guerrero, Luis Collazo, Shawn Porter, Danny Garcia, and Manny Pacquiao among others. His only loss was a split decision to Pac on a 1st round flash knockdown.

    To this point the biggest names on Tim's resume are Tony Harrison and Jeff Horn. If Tim can't get Charlo or Crawford next, Thurman is a good fight for him. If Tim can be the first to stop him that's a good notch on his belt and puts him in a better position to headline a PPV against Crawford or Charlo down the line.
    Lol Jeff Horn. Gausha and Mendoza are much better.

    Leave a comment:


  • JJ75JJ
    replied
    Originally posted by El_Mero View Post

    Isnt Tim under PBC? If so he was ordered. Big difference. This is a weak fight. Keef hasn't fought at 154. He was lined up to fight Stanionis last everyone heard, at 147..now he magically gets another title shot at 154? Funny business....& rumored to be on ppv too?!
    Not a title shot apparently.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP