Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Canelo, Broner-Williams, Navarrete, Romero, More

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Canelo, Broner-Williams, Navarrete, Romero, More

    The Daily Bread Mailbag returns with Stephen "Breadman" Edwards tackling topics such as Emanuel Navarrete and his recent win over Liam Wilson, Saul 'Canelo' Alvarez, Adrien Broner vs. Michael Williams, Women's boxing, Rolando Romero, and more.
    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Rollie was never that good to begin with. Also....I'm sick of pointless rematches. Fighters only fight twice a year. A rematch clause ties a fighter up for a year. Then we get stuck with fights like Haney vs Kambosos 2.
    Django1 StephenM likes this.

    Comment


    • #3
      Hey Breadman,got a question for you......

      How in TF are BOTH sides trying to secure the "financial advantage in a loss"...if Ryan/GBP are one and done should THEY lose??? Since you know,if Ryan loses they dont even have a damn rematch clause to exercise in the first place??

      GTFOH with your "both are to blame" if the fight isn't made nonsense.....

      Comment


      • #4
        Wilson did not get "screwed over" the punch that dropped Navarrete came when his glove was touching the canvas meaning he got hit when he was down. The ref should have given Navarrete the time he wanted to recover but he didn't so Wilson actually got a good deal he just couldn't finish the job unlike Navarrete who finished Wilson as soon as he had him hurt. I wonder if this guy thinks Castillo got "screwed over" against Corrales.

        Comment


        • #5
          Sad news that Garcia vs. Tank is still not mentioned yet.

          Comment


          • #6
            Williams vs Broner is the most gross matchmaking ever.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Sctrojan View Post
              Hey Breadman,got a question for you......

              How in TF are BOTH sides trying to secure the "financial advantage in a loss"...if Ryan/GBP are one and done should THEY lose??? Since you know,if Ryan loses they dont even have a damn rematch clause to exercise in the first place??

              GTFOH with your "both are to blame" if the fight isn't made nonsense.....
              Yeah, I disagree with Bread on the Tank vs Ryan thing. Both sides won’t be equally to blame if the fight doesn’t happen…it seems pretty clear that Tank’s side is making a ridiculous rematch clause demand in the event that they lose.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP