Kell was avoided after he beat Porter, hence him having to move to 160 for a big fight.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Brook's resume is bad.
Collapse
-
I think that he beat Porter, who was one of the top guys, but also pushed Spence very close, showed he was up there. You don't give Spence a top fight, level after 8 rounds for me, and many others, if you aren't one of the best. Brook was very good, but he definitely should have fought better guys on the whole. He should have had one more fight now as well, but took the easy option of running into retirement after beating the shell of Amir Khan. Nash out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post
Can't that claim be the rally cry of any boxer with a ''questionable'' resume ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nash out View Post
It can and it is. It's only correct in one case -- Hughie Fury. Joshua ran, Wilder ran, even Tyson Fury doesn't want the smoke of Huggy Fairy. Usyk has not mentioned his name once that I know of either, neither has Lennox Lewis stepped up. Nash out.
It's an even more feared name than Chauncy
The fear is real
Nash out likes this.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by famicommander View PostBrook vs "big four" world titlists:
W vs Lovemore N'dou UD 12
W vs Vyacheslav Senchenko TKO 4
W vs Shawn Porter MD 12
L vs Gennadiy Golovkin TKO 5
L vs Errol Spence Jr KO 11
L vs Terence Crawford TKO 4
W vs Amir Khan TKO 6
Senchenko was a way better win than Khan. Probably N'dou as well, though he was well past it at that point.
Comment
-
Bad in comparison to who? All time greats, yes maybe.
But overall he has a solid good resume, and he was World Champion.
Kell Brook can also know that he did take on big challengers, such as Golovkin, Spence Junior & Crawford.
Brook also won his world title away from home, against a unbeaten Shawn Porter.
Overall a good resume, and a great career. Brook ended his career probably with his best win, his most intrinsically valued win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BodyBagz View Post
Can't that claim be the rally cry of any boxer with a ''questionable'' resume ?
Brook's resume wasn't the best, but at least he wasn't a complete bum beater like Munguia
Comment
-
Originally posted by denium View Post
Brook didn't have to go to 160 to fight GGG, he could've continued to milk his title at 147.
Brook's resume wasn't the best, but at least he wasn't a complete bum beater like Munguia
When did this happen (if it's true) ?
The milking period might have been during that phase.
After a while, the milk would have ran out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by paulf View PostEndless names in Brooks era - Pacquiao, Mayweather, Broner, Berto, Bradley, Thurman, Marquez, Mosley, Malignaggi, Garcia, Clottey, Ortiz, Matthyse, Alvarado, Guerro, Provodnikov, Peterson etc
Brook fought one notable guy at 147 during his prime up until the Spence fight - Porter. And that was it for him. God knows why. And sure, you can say "He fought Golovkin, Spence, Porter, and Crawford!" but that's pretty misleading.
He had a weird career.... can't help but think of it as a lot of missed opportunities because the talent was clearly there.
Comment
Comment