Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Explains Why Artur Beterbiev is Not Barred From Defending Belt

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: WBC Prez Explains Why Artur Beterbiev is Not Barred From Defending Belt

    World Boxing Council (WBC) President Mauricio Sulaiman recently discussed why his organization is not barring their light heavyweight world champion, Artur Beterbiev, from moving forward with a planned summer unification with WBO champion Joe Smith at Madison Square Garden in New York City. Beterbiev also holds the IBF's world title.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Wacked_Out
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2021
    • 1650
    • 608
    • 1,197
    • 1,725

    #2
    The whole thing is asinine in the first place. Political xenophobia.

    Comment

    • AmpMcv
      idksab
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Aug 2021
      • 913
      • 634
      • 2,343
      • 0

      #3
      Seriously? Why are people so weak-minded? Oh, wait . . . I forgot.

      It's beyond conscionable how these guys try to get everyone's panties twisted in a wad. How about this is all NATO's fault and we should keep our noses out of it? Please tell me wtf a boxer of Russian decsent, who lives in frickin' Canadia, is going to do to stop this grave injustice that we're seeing on our 50 inch flat screens. Enlighten me.

      Comment

      • VashDBasher
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2018
        • 1473
        • 467
        • 145
        • 12,571

        #4
        Good, as it should be. No reason to bar the Russian athletes from making their living. **** NATO and all the angry sjw’s.

        Comment

        • sayf
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jun 2010
          • 500
          • 50
          • 40
          • 16,744

          #5
          Considering he has Canadian citizenship, I'd imagine they would have some legal trouble barring him anyway.

          I'm not sure what barring athletes actually achieves.

          Comment

          • Liondw
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2010
            • 5950
            • 1,867
            • 34
            • 23,904

            #6
            Let the guy fight, like Bivol.

            They didn't bomb any place. Yes, it's a sensitive issue, but I think it's ridiculous to ban a sports individual, as Wimbledon have done, because their country leader did and is doing whatever he's doing.

            These men and women don't support war and civilians killed, at least most of them don't. What about other areas where there are atrocities, Syria, Afghanistan, Middle East, and what bad things America has done too, have their athletes been banned? Nope.

            While I understand perhaps why sports teams have been banned or suspended, but yeah, doesn't make sense that you ban some tennis player or boxer.

            Comment

            • Jab jab boom
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2018
              • 11152
              • 4,839
              • 296
              • 118,331

              #7
              He’s just a fat hypocrite. He shouldn’t have said anything in the first place but he did and took a specific stance……then once he realized how much his pockets would be impacted with Bivol and Beterbiev landing significant fights, he back tracked and made excuses. Similar to his flip flopping over the franchise title.

              Comment

              • ELPacman
                LEGENDARY
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Apr 2004
                • 10392
                • 1,831
                • 144
                • 34,372

                #8
                I can save you the trouble of reading the article and sum it up for you. Why, he's not barred? $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$

                Okay, bye now.

                Comment

                • MulaKO
                  Zero F@cks Given
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 26356
                  • 6,610
                  • 6,027
                  • 221,421

                  #9
                  Heard it’s all the Canelo nuthuggers who are opposed to King Artur fighting

                  They demanding that the sanctioning bodies let him get a little older

                  Or at least until Canelo see’s a diminishing power


                  Comment

                  • MC Hammer
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2011
                    • 3533
                    • 149
                    • 95
                    • 29,084

                    #10
                    WNC is Mexican based organization; Mexico hasn't even sanctioned Russia so what is the point t of barring Russian fighters? Fighters who have no control of the foreign policy of their country

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP