Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin Says a Canelo Trilogy is Possible, But He Doesn't Dwell On The Subject

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • aboutfkntime
    replied
    Originally posted by Boxing-1013 View Post
    Those quotes should be the topics of class lectures I should hold for people on this website. Trying to educate you fools has been a trying experience but it is the burden we must carry I suppose. Just a bunch of dumb ingrates lol. But, such is life. Have a good one, Time.





    most of those quotes... are stupidity

    the rest... are plain ignorance

    like I said... you make some pac-tards look smart







    ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Boxing-1013
    replied
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post






    I am not the shlt-for-brains fanboy who blurted out this embarrassing garbage...



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo



    ----------------------------

    thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but will not say which one



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Lemieux, Murray... are the same level as Canelo/Jacobs



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....



    ----------------------------

    creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....



    -------------------------------

    proves that he has no idea how to score a professional boxing match...



    -------------------------------

    thinks Golovkin's resume is just as good as Pernell Whitaker's resume



    -------------------------------

    thinks that Daniel Geale is a better fighter than Jeff Fenech



    -------------------------------

    has NO idea what qualifies a fighter for greatness



    -------------------------------

    thinks that Golovkin is the same level as Duran



    -------------------------------






    you are a total embarrassment to this website

    you make some pacfans look knowledgeable






    ...
    Those quotes should be the topics of class lectures I should hold for people on this website. Trying to educate you fools has been a trying experience but it is the burden we must carry I suppose. Just a bunch of dumb ingrates lol. But, such is life. Have a good one, Time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boxing-1013
    replied
    Originally posted by LeOoze View Post

    I think Boxing-1013 is a nice poster but man he has some horrible takes that is a very awful opinion
    Everything I said there sounds just as sound today as it did when I said it. You're welcome for the education.

    Leave a comment:


  • aboutfkntime
    replied
    Originally posted by buge View Post

    You're an illiterate moron. You can't read or comprehend. The facts are right in front of you, but you let your irrational hatred blind you.

    GGG didn't lie to me. He didn't say anything to me. I don't know the guy or care that much about him.

    Why are you so emotional? Take some midol.





    FACT: your excuse was bullshlt

    FACT: after Canelo vacated the WBC middleweight title, Golovkin still refused to drop a single pound

    FACT: your excuse was bullshlt





    Funny-Crying-Baby-Face-Photo.jpg






    ...

    Leave a comment:


  • buge
    replied
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post



    you are full of shlt kid

    FACT: Canelo vacated his WBC title

    FACT: the negotiation that immediately followed, broke down because... once again, Golovkin refused to negotiate on weight

    FACT: your "he would fight Canelo at 154, but not at 155" excuse... is absurd... you have no shame

    grow up and stop defending a man who lied to you... that shlt is shameful, you clowns are straight up cucks







    ...
    You're an illiterate moron. You can't read or comprehend. The facts are right in front of you, but you let your irrational hatred blind you.

    GGG didn't lie to me. He didn't say anything to me. I don't know the guy or care that much about him.

    Why are you so emotional? Take some midol.

    Leave a comment:


  • aboutfkntime
    replied
    Originally posted by LeOoze View Post
    I think Boxing-1013 is a nice poster but man he has some horrible takes that is a very awful opinion





    he is a shlt-talking moron

    the kid would not know a good fighter if that fighter walked up and punched him in the face







    ...

    Leave a comment:


  • LeOoze
    replied
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post






    I am not the shlt-for-brains fanboy who blurted out this embarrassing garbage...



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo



    ----------------------------

    thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but will not say which one



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Lemieux, Murray... are the same level as Canelo/Jacobs



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....



    ----------------------------

    creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....



    -------------------------------

    proves that he has no idea how to score a professional boxing match...



    -------------------------------

    thinks Golovkin's resume is just as good as Pernell Whitaker's resume



    -------------------------------

    thinks that Daniel Geale is a better fighter than Jeff Fenech



    -------------------------------

    has NO idea what qualifies a fighter for greatness



    -------------------------------

    thinks that Golovkin is the same level as Duran



    -------------------------------






    you are a total embarrassment to this website

    you make some pacfans look knowledgeable






    ...
    I think Boxing-1013 is a nice poster but man he has some horrible takes that is a very awful opinion

    Leave a comment:


  • aboutfkntime
    replied
    Originally posted by Boxing-1013 View Post

    Yeah, basically I've never seen much level-headed, non-emotional critiques of anything GGG related. You are actually the poster boy for that. Look how emotional you get about everything you say.

    You use insults, curse words, and I don't think I've ever seen you say a nice comment about GGG's boxing ability.

    Why would I take anything you say about GGG seriously? You're obviously very biased lol. But oh well, who cares. Do you bud.





    I am not the shlt-for-brains fanboy who blurted out this embarrassing garbage...



    ----------------------------

    thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo

    Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
    I just made a thread about specifically why people rate Canelo's resume as better than GGG's...and I laid out my case as to why I rate GGG's better.....
    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=820918
    ----------------------------

    thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but will not say which one

    Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
    I don't think Canelo would have gotten all of his guys out by KO and maybe would not have 'won' all of them.....
    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...820918&page=10
    ----------------------------

    thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....

    Originally posted by Boxing1013
    never had a slip up against quality opposition, and he faced probably more of them than almost any other fighter in history...

    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=824905
    ----------------------------

    thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda

    Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
    I just never really saw the skills from him..... if he was born in a different country I don't think he would have been looked at much differently than Bika Barrera or Miranda etc.....
    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...2#post19903762
    ----------------------------

    thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins

    Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
    Yeah he has about 10+ good wins imo...and 5-6 'great' wins if you want to term it that...great fighter, great career...an ATG at MW...that's pretty clear I think..... If a great win is a dominant win over another prime great fighter...I would say GGG has quite a few tbh.....
    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...821123&page=20
    ----------------------------

    thinks that Lemieux, Murray... are the same level as Canelo/Jacobs

    Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
    Lemieux, Murray pretty clearly around the level of SD Canelo Jacobs...
    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...9#post20112309
    ----------------------------

    thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....

    Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
    Canelo's top wins would be Lara..Jacobs and Cotto imo...GGG's would be Jacobs, Murray and Lemieux...I don't see a ton of separation there..... winning 7-5 vs a great Lara...and going 12 with a shot fat Cotto...is not imo better than 8 Round destruction of Lemieux...and 11 round destruction of Murray..... Vanes was inactive and moving up in weight...but he wasn't shot like SSM more or less was..... I don't think going 12 with Mosley when Canelo did, or 12 with Trout, are better wins than GGG running through Monroe and Geale.....
    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...820918&page=16
    ----------------------------

    creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....

    Originally posted by Boxing1013 View Post
    Boxing1013 attempted to remove defence, ring generalship, and effective aggression, as official scoring criteria..... to justify why he thinks Golovkin beat Canelo in their rematch..... but, had NO IDEA that Steve Weisfeld was AN OFFICIAL JUDGE at the Canelo/Golovkin rematch..... and Weisfeld scored that fight for Canelo looool
    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=818903
    -------------------------------

    proves that he has no idea how to score a professional boxing match...

    Originally posted by Boxing_1013 View Post
    I'll also tell you how I score them...generally give a 'full point' for a good hard clean shot...and a 'half point' for a punch that is a scoring blow but isn't necessarily super hard or clean.
    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...3#post20372893
    -------------------------------

    thinks Golovkin's resume is just as good as Pernell Whitaker's resume

    Originally posted by Boxing_1013
    resume wise it is interesting that one dominated with decision wins over good fighters, and one with KO wins over good fighters...both having the same number of wins, and about the same number of good wins.
    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=843266
    -------------------------------

    thinks that Daniel Geale is a better fighter than Jeff Fenech

    Originally posted by Boxing_1013
    I would even say Geale in his prime was a better fighter than Fenech
    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...=843266&page=2
    -------------------------------

    has NO idea what qualifies a fighter for greatness

    I think you are once again another on here who fails to realize that what makes 99% of great fighters great - is beating 9/10 or even 10/10 of the good solid pros they faced...most greats only face 1-2 or maybe 3 other greats in their primes/best weights, and usually they have mixed results there.
    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...=843266&page=2
    -------------------------------

    thinks that Golovkin is the same level as Duran

    Originally posted by Boxing_1013 View Post
    GGG is comparable to Duran levels-wise for me...
    https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...=843918&page=4
    -------------------------------






    you are a total embarrassment to this website

    you make some pacfans look knowledgeable






    ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Shadoww702
    replied
    Originally posted by Boxing-1013 View Post

    Dude, 95% of fights have 1 winner. The 2 Canelo fights, and the Danny fight, all had 1 winner. It was GGG. Anything scoring it any differently, probably has an agenda, or just doesn't know how to score a fight. Probably the former though.

    Dervy-GGG, I could see a card where Dervy won that 7-5. The problem is that most people scoring fights have an agenda/don't know how to score.

    So I certainly don't care at all about the opinion of anyone else scoring a fight. I am scoring it for me to see who the better man was. That's all I need to watch a fight for lol.
    WE DONT know how to score fights????

    Fuk you IGNORE DEFENSE, combos, and body work!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Boxing-1013
    replied
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post






    so... nobody who is honest scores against ggg... ?

    fcuk you're an idiot







    ...
    Yeah, basically I've never seen much level-headed, non-emotional critiques of anything GGG related. You are actually the poster boy for that. Look how emotional you get about everything you say.

    You use insults, curse words, and I don't think I've ever seen you say a nice comment about GGG's boxing ability.

    Why would I take anything you say about GGG seriously? You're obviously very biased lol. But oh well, who cares. Do you bud.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP