Originally posted by Chollo Vista
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hearn Explains Why Pay-Per-View Will Be Needed on DAZN For Unique Events
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by sicko View Post
SS is a HUGE platform. They churn out articles daily and really promote they’re guys with good content, besides the poor PPV they did really well.
I agree with you, I also think Eddie does 30 interviews a week yet spends that time talking about Tyson fury and himself. Not once does he tell reporters I don’t promote fury, I’d rather discuss my stable.
Its all Me Me Me with Hearn. Left with egg on his face now. Contradicts himself daily. Total joke of a man who’s time is ticking down til he’s done.sicko Clive Davenport like this.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rockybigblower View PostI think the most important part has been missed here. According to this statement Eddie said..."maybe those fights won't be on DAZN so it won't matter". That's sounds to me like Eddie is preparing to shop Joshua around...possibly allowing him to operate like Canelo on a fight to fight basis...thus letting someone else absorb some of the costs of what is suddenly becoming a dwindling commodity. Fight fans are fickle and AJ's star is fading fast.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
How else do you expect them to make any profit or move forward?
Usyk v AJ is a fight that should be on ppv because all sports fans want to see a hwt fight of that magnitude.
I know a lot don’t want to hear this but Having it just on DAZN means a lot of American fans will not see it.
Does that make any sense? I don’t think so.Fighter78 Clive Davenport like this.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
My subscription is coming up soon so I need to know what they will be charging for these "unique boxing PPV's".
If the most I will be charged "extra" for a top fight with a good undercard is $19.99 I may try it for another year.
If not i'm ready to cancel.Fighter78 likes this.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
this is means for a serious class action law suit, no joke. When DAZN started they promised no more pay per view and now they already violated that policy. In the past I supported DAZN but with the new policy I would cancel.
An easy solution is STOP OVERPAYING BOXERS. Boxers are overpaid based on the revenue they generate. If youpay them based on ticket sales/viewership you wouldnt need to overpay them.
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
Hearn is bound to say this as he is a greedy man, not a fan, you couldn't get face value Match room tickets (stubhub)see Frank warren, and the rubbish he put on PPV on sky was criminal, superfights PPV totally understand, since hearns introduction to DAZN its gone from £1.99 to £7.99 now PPV, jocker.Clive Davenport likes this.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Toffee View PostIf they have PPV then they're just another streaming service and you judge it based on what you get for your subscription. It's been good value for me so far.
Won't pretend that I'm not disappointed that Usyk v Joshua will apparently be PPV. That fight isn't a 'unique situation', it's just a big fight.
Fury v Joshua would have been a 'unique situation' with multiple TV networks in play.
Usyk v AJ is a fight that should be on ppv because all sports fans want to see a hwt fight of that magnitude.
I know a lot don’t want to hear this but Having it just on DAZN means a lot of American fans will not see it.
Does that make any sense? I don’t think so.Oldskoolg likes this.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
So the monthly subscription was to avoid the ppv fights but now they want to charge ppv for the more popular fights. I guess it is time for me to cancel since the only reason I got it was because of the incoming content that I did not have to pay extra for. Now months go by and there is not a decent card.Fighter78 Clive Davenport like this.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: