Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Shannon Courtenay Misses Weight, Loses WBA Title At Scale; Fight With Jamie Mitchell To Proceed

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sid-Knee
    replied
    Originally posted by PBR Streetgang View Post

    You're still chirping little birdy? And writing off paragraphs? Wow, I should have known Little Miss Courtenay was something of a passion of yours when you initially fired off responses to every poster criticizing her.



    Coming back a week from what? Holiday? You inferred she fought a week prior. Your numbers were bad. Just own up to it. I have no ego with boxing, I'm just a fan. You're the one who got all weird when people criticized Courtenay. Now go along and play with your BUF flag you weird little Nationalist.
    I asked people to rationalise their comments. It had nothing per se to do with Shannon. Just justify your comments. Which is clearly something you've horribly struggled with.

    You really are dense in the head aren't you?

    To break it down. I said she's just fought. Which she had. I never said it was a week ago. It's clear i didn't. But you're still trying to make out i did?

    You were the one who said Eddie had supposedly not wanted her back. But if she had just fought not long ago, that must mean you expected her back in the ring a week or two after fighting last time out. That was your mistake. But ego got the best of you when i only asked you to back your comment up. And it still has got the best of you by you making an even bigger fool of yourself. You got everything wrong, but instead of admitting to it, you made it so much worse for yourself. You're not even making an argument, you're just making character attacks with no justification. Haha. You're the one getting all het up with the passion.

    And with me pointing out Shannon had already been signed up to fight Mitchel way before the French girl fought, it put you over the edge and further revealed your ret3rdation. Now go and learn what irony is before you make an idiot of yourself again. This is embarrassing. And can only come from a misguided ego.

    Leave a comment:


  • PBR Streetgang
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

    This also fails when you realise that Shannon was already signed to fight Mitchell on 14 August before having to reschedule due to injury. But i couldn't go deeper on your post because we couldn't get past the surface.

    Oh, and another thing. I never actually said she fought a week ago. I just took your word for it. I said she'd just fought and asked if you expected them to fight a week later.

    You have still given nothing of substance on why you would make comment on Eddie not wanting her back or not. You just cast it down as though it was the truth. But when questioned, you did the usual American madness with all the projections and tried to protect your ego when you could have just owned up to it. But no, that was far too hard for you.

    At least i now know what to expect from you in the future.
    You're still chirping little birdy? And writing off paragraphs? Wow, I should have known Little Miss Courtenay was something of a passion of yours when you initially fired off responses to every poster criticizing her.

    Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

    The French girl has just fought. Do you think she would come back a week later to confirm whether Eddie wants her back or not? Haha.
    Coming back a week from what? Holiday? You inferred she fought a week prior. Your numbers were bad. Just own up to it. I have no ego with boxing, I'm just a fan. You're the one who got all weird when people criticized Courtenay. Now go along and play with your BUF flag you weird little Nationalist.

    Leave a comment:


  • SN!PER
    replied
    Originally posted by stellen View Post
    She looked great when she beat the australian. One of my favourite ever womens fight. Good luck to her.
    I'll never forget the time she knocked out Amir Khan in the 1st round. That was truly a classic.

    ddrzd06-40815e1f-5600-4f90-8de2-2e839567cfdb.png?token=eyJ0eXAiOiJKV1QiLCJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiJ9.eyJzdWIiOiJ1cm46YXBwOjdlMGQxODg5ODIyNjQzNzNhNWYwZDQxNWVhMGQyNmUwIiwiaXNzIjoidXJuOmFwcDo3ZTBkMTg4OTgyMjY0MzczYTVmMGQ0MTVlYTBkMjZlMCIsIm9iaiI6W1t7InBhdGgiOiJcL2ZcLzF

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid-Knee
    replied
    Originally posted by PBR Streetgang View Post

    You're a long winded one. My comment was this:

    "The French fighter deserved the win against Ebanie Bridges in her last fight and would give Courtenay a proper test. Of course, maybe that's the reason Matchroom wouldn't want Gangloff back in the ring."

    I'm stating that they wouldn't want Gangloff (or anyone who would provide a tough fight) in the ring against Courtenay. Instead they tried to go with a a soft touch American in Mitchell and still lost. If you couldn't understand that then I will try to explain things a bit more simple for you next time.

    I don't have an agenda against Hearn. I criticize him no more than any other promoter and certainly less than I criticize Arum.

    It really is as simple as that, but please read into it whatever way you want.
    ​​​​


    ​​​​
    This also fails when you realise that Shannon was already signed to fight Mitchell on 14 August before having to reschedule due to injury. But i couldn't go deeper on your post because we couldn't get past the surface.

    Oh, and another thing. I never actually said she fought a week ago. I just took your word for it. I said she'd just fought and asked if you expected them to fight a week later.

    You have still given nothing of substance on why you would make comment on Eddie not wanting her back or not. You just cast it down as though it was the truth. But when questioned, you did the usual American madness with all the projections and tried to protect your ego when you could have just owned up to it. But no, that was far too hard for you.

    At least i now know what to expect from you in the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • PBR Streetgang
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

    Yes, it's the usual American thing. I'm only acknowledging the truth. If you don't like it, then don't behave like it then. If you disagree with anything, then say so. But it's hard when everything i say is true.

    I asked you a question about the comment regarding Hearn and how he supposedly doesn't want the French girl back. It doesn't really have anything to do with Shannon on my part. That wasn't why i was asking the question. I was asking it because so many Americans run their own agendas and make things up just to spew poison and bitterness when it comes to Hearn. But it seems to have put your nose out of joint because you knew you couldn't answer my simple question. Don't make comments that you can't back up. And don't project onto me like so many of you do.

    Question: Did Hearn or the French girl make any comment what so ever in regard to fighting on MatchRoom cards in the future like you claimed Eddie did? What is so hard about that?

    Why would i know the name of the French girl? Is she a big household name or something? I don't know who she is. Don't pretend you do either. You're trying to make a point where there isn't one just to be petty.

    Then to top it off, you come with a lack of irony when saying "I make bad arguments". haha. I wasn't making an argument. You were. I was just asking a question after you made comments you couldn't back up. You then projected and took offence to an innocent question.
    You're a long winded one. My comment was this:

    "The French fighter deserved the win against Ebanie Bridges in her last fight and would give Courtenay a proper test. Of course, maybe that's the reason Matchroom wouldn't want Gangloff back in the ring."

    I'm stating that they wouldn't want Gangloff (or anyone who would provide a tough fight) in the ring against Courtenay. Instead they tried to go with a a soft touch American in Mitchell and still lost. If you couldn't understand that then I will try to explain things a bit more simple for you next time.

    I don't have an agenda against Hearn. I criticize him no more than any other promoter and certainly less than I criticize Arum.

    It really is as simple as that, but please read into it whatever way you want.
    ​​​​


    ​​​​
    Last edited by PBR Streetgang; 10-13-2021, 07:20 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid-Knee
    replied
    Originally posted by PBR Streetgang View Post

    "Usual American thing"? Painting with a broad brush again. You're a nationalist with a nationalist bias...that's your narrative. Look at your posts, nearly every comment has some nationalist angle (e.g. 10/08/21:"The US is about nothing but corruption.."09/30/21: "Americans create smoke, but no fire.:, etc.), Sure, I'm American and my favorite fighter is a Brit. Look at my posts, no nationalism. I could care less where someone comes from. My comments regarding Gangloff (aka "the French woman" to your nationalist eyes) and her presence on a Hearn card were specifically regarding Courtenay on a Courtenay thread. I struck a nerve with your national sensitivities, either with Courtenay, with Hearn and Matchroom or just with Brits in general. Courtenay is no good, yet she is a staple on cards because she's a draw. They tried their best to match her against winnable fights and that failed. I've criticized PBS, Top Rank, Matchroom and Queensbury cards equally...As for you, well you're just a nationalist fraud.
    Yes, it's the usual American thing. I'm only acknowledging the truth. If you don't like it, then don't behave like it then. If you disagree with anything, then say so. But it's hard when everything i say is true.

    I asked you a question about the comment regarding Hearn and how he supposedly doesn't want the French girl back. It doesn't really have anything to do with Shannon on my part. That wasn't why i was asking the question. I was asking it because so many Americans run their own agendas and make things up just to spew poison and bitterness when it comes to Hearn. But it seems to have put your nose out of joint because you knew you couldn't answer my simple question. Don't make comments that you can't back up. And don't project onto me like so many of you do.

    Question: Did Hearn or the French girl make any comment what so ever in regard to fighting on MatchRoom cards in the future like you claimed Eddie did? What is so hard about that?

    Why would i know the name of the French girl? Is she a big household name or something? I don't know who she is. Don't pretend you do either. You're trying to make a point where there isn't one just to be petty.

    Then to top it off, you come with a lack of irony when saying "I make bad arguments". haha. I wasn't making an argument. You were. I was just asking a question after you made comments you couldn't back up. You then projected and took offence to an innocent question.

    Leave a comment:


  • PBR Streetgang
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid-Knee View Post

    Haha, the only one rambling here is you.

    I wasn't being literal with it being a week. But you weren't expecting her to fight this weekend, so it must have been over the last couple of weeks or so. So a week on your part is actually quite true.

    You said Eddie didn't want her back. Have you got anything from Eddie or the girl that confirms your comments? If not, you're running a narrative. Yet you accused me of doing so. It seems you're projecting and desperately trying to turn it on me. That is being emotional. In fact, it's disturbing. Nice try though, but it's the usual arrogant American trick. But arrogance without intellect just provides stupidity.

    You also accused me of running narratives in the past too. Care to back this up as well?

    Lets see if you answer the questions or do the usual American thing and avoid. I know where my money is being placed.
    "Usual American thing"? Painting with a broad brush again. You're a nationalist with a nationalist bias...that's your narrative. Look at your posts, nearly every comment has some nationalist angle (e.g. 10/08/21:"The US is about nothing but corruption.."09/30/21: "Americans create smoke, but no fire.:, etc.), Sure, I'm American and my favorite fighter is a Brit. Look at my posts, no nationalism. I could care less where someone comes from. My comments regarding Gangloff (aka "the French woman" to your nationalist eyes) and her presence on a Hearn card were specifically regarding Courtenay on a Courtenay thread. I struck a nerve with your national sensitivities, either with Courtenay, with Hearn and Matchroom or just with Brits in general. Courtenay is no good, yet she is a staple on cards because she's a draw. They tried their best to match her against winnable fights and that failed. I've criticized PBS, Top Rank, Matchroom and Queensbury cards equally...As for you, well you're just a nationalist fraud.

    Leave a comment:


  • Boxing-1013
    replied
    Originally posted by P to the J View Post


    What, biology?

    Going by your standard and considering how many uncommitted and fat b4stard boxers I've seen miss weight (looking at you Gervonta Davis & Julio Cesar Chavez Jr among others) wondering if anyone should take men's boxing seriously...
    It would be like a man saying that he came in a few pounds overweight because he just had a break up with his girl. It's a laughable excuse from a laughable sport

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid-Knee
    replied
    Originally posted by MANNY67 View Post

    Yeah so who has Shannon fought or should I say miss piggy
    We're not talking about the power of Shannon though are we?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid-Knee
    replied
    Originally posted by PBR Streetgang View Post

    Man you ramble. You're getting at a point? I think you quite missed mine. The point I was making is that Hearn doesn't want Courtenay in against anyone that could possibly beat her (of which the French girl Mailys Gangloff is one of many that could beat her). Rachel Ball was supposed to be a soft touch until she dropped and soundly outboxed Shannon.

    You make bad arguments that aren't even factually correct. You stated the French girl fought last week inferring a short turnaround when it was actually a month. I must have struck a nerve with my criticism of Courtenay's boxing ability, didn't realize you were so emotional about her. Cheers
    Haha, the only one rambling here is you.

    I wasn't being literal with it being a week. But you weren't expecting her to fight this weekend, so it must have been over the last couple of weeks or so. So a week on your part is actually quite true.

    You said Eddie didn't want her back. Have you got anything from Eddie or the girl that confirms your comments? If not, you're running a narrative. Yet you accused me of doing so. It seems you're projecting and desperately trying to turn it on me. That is being emotional. In fact, it's disturbing. Nice try though, but it's the usual arrogant American trick. But arrogance without intellect just provides stupidity.

    You also accused me of running narratives in the past too. Care to back this up as well?

    Lets see if you answer the questions or do the usual American thing and avoid. I know where my money is being placed.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP