Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Luke Campbell: Joshua Has To Put It On Usyk, Impose His Strengths To Win

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Monty Fisto
    replied
    Originally posted by Sayithowitisuk View Post

    Monty... Another casual Aj showerboy.
    My original quote said no human being is athletically the same after 34-36 & thats a fact with the odd anomaly.
    Klitschko 41 shot & old, had Aj in the 5th but couldn't finish the job because he was ancient.
    Takem 38 stand in nobody, levelled by 10 loss Chisora
    Povetkin without the peds 38 knackered again by the 4th
    & Pulev 40 who was never world class & got his shot beating Fury lite


    Bitd when iron mike destroyed 38 yr old Holmes he was considered to old & he get's no credit yet today Aj fight's even older shot boxers regularly no where near his skill level like takem pov & pulev & you praise him.

    Gtfoh! Worse heavyweight era than even Klitschko, at least we had a champ.

    I usually post n ghost but this is fun having to put muppets with no knowledge in they're place. Get your facts right boy! Byeeee
    No, my friend. DaNeutral asked a very simple question: who was the last 40-year old Joshua fought. You gave a long-winded response. My post was the actual answer to the question.

    I do not care what you wrote about what people do in their thirties. It's irrelevant to the question, isn't it?

    Leave a comment:


  • hugh grant
    replied
    Josh might need a few gameplans. Maybe try box, see how it goes. If usyk is boxing his ears of, then maybe go macho and bring it

    Leave a comment:


  • KP1
    replied
    Originally posted by DaNeutral. View Post

    Yet Wilder gets praise for beating Luis Ortiz, twice? And other than Pulev who was a mandatory which 40 year olds are you talking about? Povetkin? Also a mandatory. You saying Joshua should drop his belts and pass on his mandos to please you?

    And wash your self clean of this Anthony Joshua didn't want Wilder bollocks,, that narrative was dismantled by Wilder himself when he admitted he was offered more money to face AJ but he passed it by to face Fury.

    Him and that other gimp are chatting utter gibberish, Wilder and Fury both turned down the biggest pay day of their lives.

    And as for the matchroom judges pish, AJ has never had his hand raised when he should have lost, Fury has and Wilder was gifted a draw, but AJ’s apparently the protected one, they must think everybody’s as thick as them.
    DaNeutral. DaNeutral. likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jkp
    replied
    Originally posted by Sayithowitisuk View Post

    You obviously can't read.
    I wrote 38-41 old & shot. Not 40!

    Aj had the window to box Wilder for undesputed in 18 but Edward blocked it with famous low balls then Aj turned down a proven flat 50 mill.quack

    Yes they were mando's that rarely boxed until they got theyre shot the division is in such a terrible state.

    As for your 2nd statement your again completely wrong.
    In 18 Aj said on sky "i won't be rushed into the Wilder fight" when asked when he said"19 20 21"Hearn then said 2020. Quack
    In 19 (A YEAR LATER) yes Wilder turned down the dazn money Quack, though Aj wasn't even on the contract because Aj had a Sky contract which he still has.

    I'll repeat myself. They're both as bad as each other & as for Fury, seriously who knows of he'll even fight again.

    Da neutral, obviously not. Aj & Edward didn't want Wilder! They even told us on sky tv & it still doesn't compute with you. #moneballboxing #milkingcasuals #oldmandatories

    There not as bad as each other. 2 of the top 3 have fought each other twice. It's clear who really willing to fight best in division.... because there actually fighting them....

    Leave a comment:


  • Jkp
    replied
    Originally posted by Ropeydope View Post
    I really don’t see AJ beating Usyk on points. He needs to time him with one of those famous uppercuts and put his lights out.

    Every matchroom judge will be ruling in favor of AJ, whether he's winning the fight or not

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob
    replied
    Originally posted by DaNeutral. View Post

    Yet Wilder gets praise for beating Luis Ortiz, twice? And other than Pulev who was a mandatory which 40 year olds are you talking about? Povetkin? Also a mandatory. You saying Joshua should drop his belts and pass on his mandos to please you?

    And wash your self clean of this Anthony Joshua didn't want Wilder bollocks,, that narrative was dismantled by Wilder himself when he admitted he was offered more money to face AJ but he passed it by to face Fury.
    You obviously can't read.
    I wrote 38-41 old & shot. Not 40!

    Aj had the window to box Wilder for undesputed in 18 but Edward blocked it with famous low balls then Aj turned down a proven flat 50 mill.quack

    Yes they were mando's that rarely boxed until they got theyre shot the division is in such a terrible state.

    As for your 2nd statement your again completely wrong.
    In 18 Aj said on sky "i won't be rushed into the Wilder fight" when asked when he said"19 20 21"Hearn then said 2020. Quack
    In 19 (A YEAR LATER) yes Wilder turned down the dazn money Quack, though Aj wasn't even on the contract because Aj had a Sky contract which he still has.

    I'll repeat myself. They're both as bad as each other & as for Fury, seriously who knows of he'll even fight again.

    Da neutral, obviously not. Aj & Edward didn't want Wilder! They even told us on sky tv & it still doesn't compute with you. #moneballboxing #milkingcasuals #oldmandatories

    Last edited by Bob; 09-04-2021, 01:53 PM.
    Jkp Jkp likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaNeutral.
    replied
    Originally posted by Sayithowitisuk View Post

    Are you serious?

    4 of rematch clause Ajs last 6 opponents have been shot 38-41 year olds with only 4 good rounds in them.
    Its ok for up & comers (though i think it's dangerous) but belt holder's.

    No human being after 34-36 is the same which is why without fighting Fury is still the number 1 heavyweight, its rediculous. Ajs never even boxed a top 2 heavyweight & don't argue Klitschko (one idiot has here) 41 retired nearly 2 years after looking shot to bit's against Fury, removed from the tbrb rankings the December before.

    Aj & Edward have been milking casual londoners who support they're homeboy since 18 when Aj said in a sky interview "i won't be rushed into the Wilder fight" when asked when he said"19 20 21"Hearn then said 2020 & that Wilder might even loose by then.
    Funny that Wilder looses & they suddenly want undesputed.
    #moneballboxing #milkingcasuals

    & to think i was a fan.
    Yet Wilder gets praise for beating Luis Ortiz, twice? And other than Pulev who was a mandatory which 40 year olds are you talking about? Povetkin? Also a mandatory. You saying Joshua should drop his belts and pass on his mandos to please you?

    And wash your self clean of this Anthony Joshua didn't want Wilder bollocks,, that narrative was dismantled by Wilder himself when he admitted he was offered more money to face AJ but he passed it by to face Fury.
    Last edited by DaNeutral.; 09-04-2021, 11:29 AM.
    KP1 KP1 likes this.

    Leave a comment:


  • Corelone
    replied
    Impose his strength? AJ has every edge imaginable. Height, reach, weight, age, hometown, pay. The only edge Usyk has is in his fans head.

    Leave a comment:


  • techliam
    replied
    Originally posted by Ropeydope View Post
    I really don’t see AJ beating Usyk on points. He needs to time him with one of those famous uppercuts and put his lights out.
    Don’t worry, there’ll be a couple of judges installed to help with this. A couple of US judges will do just fine

    Leave a comment:


  • KP1
    replied
    Fury & Wilders only good wins are guys mid 30’s or older.

    Never seems to be a problem there.



    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP