Pac"Rigo ran like Mayweather, didn't fight"Daayuum that salts lethal!
Collapse
-
I have a better round by round clips dissected per round, No splicing or editing proving Pac connected more than Floyd can ever do. All the seconds of a round kept in the video. My epic thread is almost 800,000 views. Check it out.
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/b...s-blow-by-blow
No one wants a rematch. Street cred is more important. The fight
Receipts have already proven who connected more in that debbie downer fight were in Pac had to chase Floyd from pillar to post and as the facts have shown connected more throughout the fight. You can say, Pac's hands was too fast that the judges and the biased coverage was either blind or they were biased for the hometown boy.
What matters is Pac was half the man he was having a busted shoulder that night and still was able to connect more than an IV ridden bigger man as Floyd ran for dear life as his father called him out for fighting scared.
That in itself is a statement that will linger on.
That in itself is why Pac deserves the W.







Last edited by Spoon23; 08-16-2021, 08:02 PM.Comment
-
He’s salty that he lost hence why he’s making ridiculous excuses for the loss.
The thread is about Pacquaio’s salty comparison to his loss to Floyd.
Salty comparison you are overexaggerating. They asked him about the fight and he gave a straight answer with a smile on his face. He didn't go on and on like Floyd and you Floyd boys do with your excuses. Where did you get salty from.
You re echoing Pacquaio's pathetic excuses for why he under performed because Floyd didn't engage and moved around, when Pacquaio threw less punches than Floyd.
Ha thats rich Floyd did nothing but run and clinch. They both underperformed if anything and you know why. Its one past prime guy, fighting another way way past prime guy. Thats why the ultimate measuring stick is when both guys are prime so there's no excuses. Wtf you expect Manny or any other fighter in that position is going to say.
Again, you can claim he ran and clinched all you want, the reality is he did neither. How many clinches did he initiate in 12 rounds?
Floyd was further past his best than Pacquaio but you can throw another excuse in there if you like. Add to the theme of the thread. It’s irrelevant.
Pacquaio can say what he wants, he can take the loss like a man or he can act salty about it and have clowns like you echo his sentiment, he chooses the latter. He’s a grown man that’s on him.
I couldn’t care less, I’ll still happily laugh at it though because it’s embarrassing behaviour.Comment
-
Ha listen to what you saying. Floyd ducks the whole division those guys are fighting each other and he comes to fight a lightweight. What the weakest welterweight was too big of a risk? You gotta be ****ting me.
And in what world is Juan Manuel Marquez a guy whose only claim to fame is having Manny's number, an all time great? This should be real good.
Comment
-
considering after he fought Marquez he beat Shane Mosley, the lineal champion at 147, that's a pretty good transition to me.
Ha listen to what you saying. Floyd ducks the whole division those guys are fighting each other and he comes to fight a lightweight. What the weakest welterweight was too big of a risk? You gotta be ****ting me.
And in what world is Juan Manuel Marquez a guy whose only claim to fame is having Manny's number, an all time great? This should be real good.
if you don't think Marquez is an ATG it makes Pac look even worse.Comment
-
He's salty that he lost hence why he's making ridiculous excuses for the loss.
He's salty that he lost hence why he's making ridiculous excuses for the loss.
Again, you can claim he ran and clinched all you want, the reality is he did neither. How many clinches did he initiate in 12 rounds?
Floyd was further past his best than Pacquaio but you can throw another excuse in there if you like. Add to the theme of the thread. It's irrelevant.
Pacquaio can say what he wants, he can take the loss like a man or he can act salty about it and have clowns like you echo his sentiment, he chooses the latter. He’s a grown man that’s on him.
I couldn’t care less, I’ll still happily laugh at it though because it’s embarrassing behaviour.
He certainly didn't sound salty. He gave a straight answer to a straight question about another fight. He compared it to one of his fights wtf was he supposed to do.
Again, you can claim he ran and clinched all you want, the reality is he did neither. How many clinches did he initiate in 12 rounds?
I don't have to claim anything. The reality is you you can answer that question yourself by watching the fight and counting how many times your boy clinched.
One word of advice bring some no doze to keep you awake for the full 12 rounds.
Floyd was further past his best than Pacquaio but you can throw another excuse in there if you like. Add to the theme of the thread. It's irrelevant.
You starting to sound like Big Dunn and Floyd Boys who started watching boxing 5 years ago. Only in Floyd Boy world where two guys pushing 40 is prime elite boxing. They both not prime who gives a **** who was more past it really thats a matter of opinion. You can't say Floyd beat the man in his prime so you gotta make up every excuse in the world to circumvent it.
Pacquaio can say what he wants, he can take the loss like a man or he can act salty about it and have clowns like you echo his sentiment, he chooses the latter. He’s a grown man that’s on him.
I couldn’t care less, I’ll still happily laugh at it though because it’s embarrassing behaviour.
Well again if your boy would have just fought the best guys in their prime none of this foolishness would get air time. Iron Dan nobody care that you care less. You are just as much a part of the hypocrisy as anyone else because you don't know how to make your point and stfu.
Comment
-
Floyd made a low tier all time great career out of beating guys out of their prime.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Floyd and rigo are almost twin they fight the same in the ring.
Comment
Comment