Comments Thread For: Hearn Suspects Team Fury Never Wanted Joshua Fight: 'I Felt a Little Betrayed'

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DaNeutral.
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2018
    • 10087
    • 1,665
    • 342
    • 144,794

    #61
    Originally posted by Cortez

    Let's get one thing clear you don't know any real details, nobody does, just hearsay.
    Even Wilder said he turned down a more lucrative offer to face Wilder and we all know Hearn just put together one of the biggest deals the sport has ever seen to have an undisputed fight in the Middle East. That is not hearsay those things actually happened. I don’t know all the details but i do know neither of those fights didn’t happen because Joshua didn’t want them to.


    I know you Hearn/Joshua haters are desperate to make as much negative talk about AJ and Hearn but ignoring facts cuz it don’t suit your narrative is a bit lame. So fkk your fake hearsay i deal in either facts or opinion and you are ignoring the facts.

    Comment

    • Cortez
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Apr 2005
      • 415
      • 72
      • 15
      • 11,170

      #62
      Originally posted by DaNeutral.

      Even Wilder said he turned down a more lucrative offer to face Wilder and we all know Hearn just put together one of the biggest deals the sport has ever seen to have an undisputed fight in the Middle East. That is not hearsay those things actually happened. I don’t know all the details but i do know neither of those fights didn’t happen because Joshua didn’t want them to.


      I know you Hearn/Joshua haters are desperate to make as much negative talk about AJ and Hearn but ignoring facts cuz it don’t suit your narrative is a bit lame. So fkk your fake hearsay i deal in either facts or opinion and you are ignoring the facts.
      Wilder also said little green men poisoned his water.

      Comment

      • Monzon99
        Banned
        • Oct 2019
        • 2485
        • 199
        • 13
        • 53,288

        #63
        Originally posted by billeau2

        Right... so if I offered you... not even a professional fighter (presumably) a measely half of 75 million to step in the ring with Joshua... you would be afraid and wouldn't? Yet a fellow professional fighter is sooo deathly afraid of another fighter he will not take the kind of saudi money on the table. Are you thinking this through? ben Asknew took half a million dollars to get starched and it was the best payday of his career! Spinks was so intimidated by Tyson he practically pissed on Mike's leg... But was able... yet Fury and Wilder are such a departure from human nature.

        And such patriotism... Really? I dont even know how to address that...

        Think people think!!!
        fraud wilder and haymon ducked $120m to fight AJ. these greedy scoundrels believe they can make that money without taking the loss to AJ. they believe they can build up the fury wilder rivalry into a huge $100m events and leave AJ Hearn out of the equation.

        Comment

        • Monzon99
          Banned
          • Oct 2019
          • 2485
          • 199
          • 13
          • 53,288

          #64
          Haymon and Arum actually are down to nothing now, spence davis are non draws, charlos are nothing. arum lost Lopez and Pac. Arum only has fury and haymon is down to wilder. so they can't afford to cash them out to AJ. I'm quite certain haymon and arum are in an alliance now to block out AJ and Hearn from the US market. and they think with if they keep matching fury and wilder in more fake fights, they can create a Frazier Ali type big rivalry. I'm certain they both intend to duck Aj Hearn forever.

          Comment

          • Monty Fisto
            And still...
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2018
            • 3441
            • 1,467
            • 855
            • 22,690

            #65
            Originally posted by Cortez

            Fury is the undisputed champion what are you talking about, he's clear number 1. He is the ring champion the oldest of all the titles by far and no1 fought no 2 for the title.

            Stop putting stock in the alphabet soup titles. If a man is ranked no 3 or no 4 or whatever then he's a challenger, stop falling for the nonsense.

            Also anyway fury has won every title and never lost.
            Today I watched the European Olympic qualifications and it was amazing no bs music, no 100 ****** belts, no Kings chairs or silly costumes just high quality boxing, it's amazing the crap that sucks people in
            I'm talking about objective fact. Fury is not the undisputed champion. What are you talking about? In what way is Fury undisputed? His claim is the very definition of disputed -- Champ who walks away from the ring for literally years and someone else unifies a bunch of the belts while he's away means there is no clear champion.

            It would be like Ali coming back in the early 70s and saying there was no need to fight Frasier because he was no.1 all along.

            The claim of number 1 fought number 2 is spurious as hell. Fury was a fat whale. Since he came back from being a fat whale he's beaten Wilder and a bunch of low ranked fighters. Wilder, in the meantime, over his whole career has beaten who exactly to establish his credentials?
            Last edited by Monty Fisto; 06-05-2021, 08:42 PM.

            Comment

            • Cortez
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Apr 2005
              • 415
              • 72
              • 15
              • 11,170

              #66
              Originally posted by Monty Fisto

              I'm talking about objective fact. Fury is not the undisputed champion. What are you talking about? In what way is Fury undisputed? His claim is the very definition of disputed -- Champ who walks away from the ring for literally years and someone else unifies a bunch of the belts while he's away means there is no clear champion.

              It would be like Ali coming back in the early 70s and saying there was no need to fight Frasier because he was no.1 all along.

              The claim of number 1 fought number 2 is spurious as hell. Fury was a fat whale. Since he came back from being a fat whale he's beaten Wilder and a bunch of low ranked fighters. Wilder, in the meantime, over his whole career has beaten who exactly to establish his credentials?
              One and two was clear once AJ lost by practically everyone.

              Also fury is the only person in this era to get the ring title and twice. Nobody else did that even when he retired.

              Counting these alphabet bodies essentially means that you could have up to 40-top ten contenders and this is just ludicrous.

              Comment

              • MastaBlasta
                Undisputed Champion
                • Jul 2017
                • 1851
                • 236
                • 328
                • 36,075

                #67
                Originally posted by DaNeutral.

                Hearn was not given the play by play of it, there was a supposed gagging order (which I don’t believe) so he was only fed lies. Hearn shouldn’t of trusted them, he shouldn’t of been so naive but then two of the biggest promoters in the game and a World champion shouldn’t be lying when it comes to trying to make the biggest deal in the whole of the sport.

                Let’s face it, had Hearn refused to try to make this deal due to the concerns you say he should of had the narrative of ducking and of Joshua not really wanting undisputed would of been jumped on big time. Literally everything from the salty haters is negative to every thing Hearn and Joshua do even though it’s the other side that we’re down right conniving and dirty this whole time.
                So you're saying hearn shouldn't rely on his legal background, or the advice of Matchroom attorneys ... nor on their own experiences with legal proceedings per fight contract issues (particularly enforcing rematches) ... but instead should worry about "the narrative of ducking" from "salty haters"? Really?

                Again, I can't think of anything that would be less professional nor more incompetent ... particularly while working through the LEGAL ISSUES of contracting and promoting "the biggest fight in boxing". Your comments dig hearn a much larger hole.

                The plain truth is whenever hearn/AJ are trying to egotiate a big fight, hearns attempts to control and dictate everything in absurd adavantages for AJ pretty much causes a myriad of issues ... that so far, have wrecked the fights.

                Comment

                • Lance98
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Sep 2018
                  • 2909
                  • 876
                  • 6
                  • 22,215

                  #68
                  AJ didn't want wilder when fury was going through his mental issues and was overweight. Eddie played a lot of games and downplayed wilder. Now he got played. Regardless, bob is an old hag that can't be trusted, frank warren from what I have heard about him, is a snake as well. I don't have a preference on who I support, so it's amusing to see these clowns owning each other and making the other look like fools.

                  Comment

                  • kingstip9
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2011
                    • 2094
                    • 488
                    • 63
                    • 32,854

                    #69
                    Lol fk off Eddie Hearn

                    Comment

                    • Ray*
                      Be safe!!!
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 44867
                      • 1,654
                      • 1,608
                      • 558,890

                      #70
                      Wasn’t the “delay” from the Saudis who couldn’t confirm the money? Or so we were told after weeks and weeks of telling us that it would be announced this week, then this week, then this week..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP