No, no. Examples include where Cotto was on the ropes, towards the right of the picture and Clottey comes in. Cotto sends a wicked hook in and Clottey stumbles, clearly sent off balance by the shot. Also, that vicious hook towards the end of one of rounds which had Clottey looking up at row Z.
just rewatched and did round by round scoring for cotto-clottey
Collapse
-
-
that is why you are not a judgei had it 9 rounds to 3 for clottey..my score was 116-110..and i watched this thoroughly..i gave cotto round 1(obviously) round 6 and round 12..something else i would like to point out, i think one of the judges scored the 6th round a 10-8 round for cotto. well i dont see how that is possible because clottey was firing combinations back when he was in the corner..and he was landing flush shots and actually hurt cotto. but i gave that round to cotto for ring generalship and workrate...and i will repeat myself once again I WATCHED EVERY SINGLE ROUND THOROUGHLY!! the story of the fight was cotto throwing shots at clottey's guard and clottey firing back and landing the effective punches. cotto COULD of been given the 11nth round for the two left hooks he landed at the end of the round but i gave it to clottey because he controlled the round and landed more shots than cotto. if you diasagree with me, EXPLAIN why dont just say "your ******ed" blah blah..give me a reason why im wrong.Comment
-
I had Cotto by a hair. I think Clottey exceeded expectations which is why more people say he was "robbed". Get out, the fight was close and could have gone either way. I had no problem with the decision except for the 1 judge who had it 116-111 Cotto or some ****.Comment
-

I was at the fight and if you have it scored by that wide of a margin, dude you were watching the wrong fight! I had it 114-113 Cotto and I was ringside. Clottey could have won the fight but gave away the last 2 rounds. We asked Clottey that after the fight and he said he though he had done enough to take the last 2 rounds off but he made a mistake and he said he wouldn't make that mistake again.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment