Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

James toney was not on the level of jones.. hopkins and calzaghe

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    prime has nothing to do with it,
    Spoken like a true idiot.

    hopkins in his prime was still #2 or #3 behind jones anyway.
    And...?

    james toney has a pathetic resume btw besides 4-5 good names.
    Then you must think Joe Calzaghe's is complete and utter garbage, no?

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
      Spoken like a true idiot.



      And...?



      Then you must think Joe Calzaghe's is complete and utter garbage, no?
      what top p4p fighters did hopkins beat? top 5?

      pavlik? well im sorry a past prime bernard hopkins is much better than kelly pavlik and is even higher p4p. now you see what i mean **** for brains?

      look at toney's resume excluding mccallum,jirov,nunn and a few others, it's dior.

      toney fought more bums than calzaghe fought people.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by boxasmash View Post
        what top p4p fighters did hopkins beat? top 5?

        pavlik? well im sorry a past prime bernard hopkins is much better than kelly pavlik and is even higher p4p. now you see what i mean **** for brains?

        look at toney's resume excluding mccallum,jirov,nunn and a few others, it's dior.

        toney fought more bums than calzaghe fought people.
        please, look up and tell me what fighters Calzaghe beat that were EVER in the top 10 at their weight. its surprisingly low.

        now look up the guys that Toney beat over 5 weight classes including heavyweight, and tell me how many of them were top 10 at their weight when Toney beat them.

        and besides, Hopkins is Calzaghe's best win, right? well, when Toney beat Nunn, Nunn was p4p #3 and was undefeated, not to mention in his 20s. Hopkins, on the other hand...
        Jirov>Kessler, because he fought 32lbs above the weight Kessler fought at, was #1 at Cruiserweight and had beaten good opponents.
        McCallum>Eubank, because McCallum easily outpointed Steve Collins and crumbled Michael Watson, both guys who either beat or gave hell to Eubank.
        Barkley>Lacy, because he actually has worthwhile wins on his record and was an alphabet belt champ in three different weight classes.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by boxasmash View Post
          it argue he had more skill jones and calzaghe's physical gifts put him above toney though.
          No man your wrong, with all due respect you need to watch some prime Toney. Saying he was a faliure, YES. Saying he was an underachiever, YES.

          His skill is not in question. Every Gym I have ever been in has said how Toney is a natural at this sport. His defense was one of the best of his time and that was even being old, fat and slow.

          Even Freddie Roach said Toney was the most naturally talented fighter he has ever trained and he's trained some great ones.

          Comment


          • #25
            what top p4p fighters did hopkins beat? top 5?
            Felix Trinidad, WBA middleweight champ, was ranked #1 p4p.

            pavlik? well im sorry a past prime bernard hopkins is much better than kelly pavlik and is even higher p4p. now you see what i mean **** for brains?
            Oh I definitely see **** for brains.

            look at toney's resume excluding mccallum,jirov,nunn and a few others, it's dior.
            LMAO. What does this mean?
            toney fought more bums than calzaghe fought people.
            And still has a better resume.

            Comment


            • #26
              wow I forgot why I stopped coming to this site.. now I remember. this is joke right? Toney is a future HOF.. one of the greatest fighters in the past 20 years. do you even know who James toney is or you just throwing his name around because you have watch a couple of his recent fights against HW's..

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by boxasmash View Post
                good fighter, very good fighter toney but he was no great. to beat toney you need good speed and movement, toney looked his best against fighters who only fought up close against him and didn't mix it up.

                all three of these fighters have good speed, footwork and can adapt! toney was only suited for counter punching off the ropes and never looked good coming forward.
                Jones is head and shoulders above the rest here, with Toney and Hopinks over Joe IMO.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                  Felix Trinidad, WBA middleweight champ, was ranked #1 p4p.



                  Oh I definitely see **** for brains.


                  LMAO. What does this mean?

                  And still has a better resume.
                  #1 p4p?

                  yeah right...

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by boxasmash View Post
                    prime has nothing to do with it, hopkins in his prime was still #2 or #3 behind jones anyway.

                    james toney has a pathetic resume btw besides 4-5 good names.
                    I ****ing hope that you're an alt. Every one of your posts are loaded with hypocrisy. Look at Calzaghes resume you abo ****sucker.

                    Jones, Toney and hopkins >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Calzaghe.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by boxasmash View Post
                      #1 p4p?

                      yeah right...
                      What's so funny?

                      You keep showing your knowledge, or lack thereof.

                      Felix Trinidad was ranked #1 or #1a at the time Hopkins fought him.

                      Laugh at that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP