Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hopkins better than Hagler and Monzon?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Hagler would actually embaress him for the first time ever. Hagler would systematically break Hopkins face.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by abadger View Post
      tua > michelin man
      catherine zeta-jones > tom jones > jimmy wilde > enzo mac > joe calzaghe

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by KTerceira View Post
        This is not really a serious question is it..

        12 or 15 rounds wouldn't matter , both Hagler and Carlos would take B-Hop out in 10...

        B-hop couldn't take the non stop pressure from either fighter and Haglers hooks on Hopkins arms and shoulders would tire him to the point of no return..
        arkansas > pennsylvania

        Comment


        • #24
          The problem is that these guys like to predict Hops gettin KO'd cause the don't like him or actually watch his prime fights. Hagler wasn't the smartest fighter, he was amazing at what he did but I think Bernard would have the movement and counter ability to hit him with right hands all day. And Bernard was built to be a 15 round fighter. It was his endless stamina and fitness that lets him still fight on the highest level past 40. But yeah let's talk about how 'overrated' he is beating Winky at 42.
          And yeah I smoke crack wanna fight about it?!

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
            catherine zeta-jones > tom jones > jimmy wilde > enzo mac > joe calzaghe
            I'm not Welsh, but I do prefer Catherine Zeta Jones to Joe on a pound for pound basis.

            The reason Hopkins is better than Hagler and Monzon is because Joe Calzaghe beat him. As a 'biased brit' the only thing I care about is 'lying, denying and distorting information' to make Calzaghe look better. Therefore, since Hagler and Monzon can never fight Joe, it is my opinion that the best MW of all time is Bernard Hopkins, in fact I make him #3 on my ATG list:

            #1 Calzaghe
            #2 Kessler
            #3 Hopkins

            I'm still trying to work out whether i should save a spot for Roy or whether to just go ahead and put Will "Kid Fire" McKintyre and Sakio Bika in at 4 and 5.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Spiegelo View Post
              The problem is that these guys like to predict Hops gettin KO'd cause the don't like him or actually watch his prime fights. Hagler wasn't the smartest fighter, he was amazing at what he did but I think Bernard would have the movement and counter ability to hit him with right hands all day. And Bernard was built to be a 15 round fighter. It was his endless stamina and fitness that lets him still fight on the highest level past 40. But yeah let's talk about how 'overrated' he is beating Winky at 42.
              And yeah I smoke crack wanna fight about it?!
              beating winky , tito or oscar is not the same thing as beating hagler , s.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by abadger View Post
                I'm not Welsh, but I do prefer Catherine Zeta Jones to Joe on a pound for pound basis.

                The reason Hopkins is better than Hagler and Monzon is because Joe Calzaghe beat him. As a 'biased brit' the only thing I care about is 'lying, denying and distorting information' to make Calzaghe look better. Therefore, since Hagler and Monzon can never fight Joe, it is my opinion that the best MW of all time is Bernard Hopkins, in fact I make him #3 on my ATG list:

                #1 Calzaghe
                #2 Kessler
                #3 Hopkins

                I'm still trying to work out whether i should save a spot for Roy or whether to just go ahead and put Will "Kid Fire" McKintyre and Sakio Bika in at 4 and 5.
                Being that he clearly whooped on Kessler and Hops gave him a very tough time to say the least, shouldn't Hops be #2 on your biased list of all time? I'M JUST SAYIN!!

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Spiegelo View Post
                  Being that he clearly whooped on Kessler and Hops gave him a very tough time to say the least, shouldn't Hops be #2 on your biased list of all time? I'M JUST SAYIN!!
                  ha ha ha ha

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Spiegelo View Post
                    Being that he clearly whooped on Kessler and Hops gave him a very tough time to say the least, shouldn't Hops be #2 on your biased list of all time? I'M JUST SAYIN!!
                    Never. Mikkel Kessler has a really cool tattoo.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
                      beating winky , tito or oscar is not the same thing as beating hagler , s.
                      At 42 beating a p4p fighter that hasn't been clearly beaten since the days of Vazquez however many years ago that was says a lot. Just imagine what he could do at 36.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP