Once AGAIN, there is no point in discussing what Haye could or couldn't do at heavy..

[Guest]

... he's fought once at the weight (technically twice) and against limited opposition to see what it was like.

He'll make his official debut at the weight c. November.

What is the point of saying what he will or won't do when we simply CAN'T KNOW until then??

I suspect he might actually be good against the smaller heavies... the bigger guys I'm not so sure about. But that's just CONJECTURE right now. HYPOTHETICAL, get it?

FFS.

[S.G.]

it's a boxing forum, of course people are gonna be speculating and arguing about how Haye will do in the heavyweights

[T-97]

It's all speculation Annie,

But your right. We will not be able to gauge his full potential until Novemver

[Hitman932]

I like the way David Haye excuses his sloppy, lunging, off balance footwork by crediting it for "creating angles"

[Kastrioti]

In that case there wouldn't be a point in discussing anything in NSB, 99% of NSB threads are opinions. Who will win Pavlik-Hopkins, who would win PBF-Cotto and so on.

[The Surgeon]

... he's fought once at the weight (technically twice) and against limited opposition to see what it was like.

He'll make his official debut at the weight c. November.

What is the point of saying what he will or won't do when we simply CAN'T KNOW until then??

I suspect he might actually be good against the smaller heavies... the bigger guys I'm not so sure about. But that's just CONJECTURE right now. HYPOTHETICAL, get it?

FFS.

Calm ur ass down Annie its what we do, talk **** about boxing, fantasy matchups, what ifs, and so on so on u know the drill uve been here since 1808 or sum ****!