Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roy Jones Jr at 168 would have beaten Calzaghe

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wiley Hyena
    replied
    Originally posted by ThaHorseman View Post
    Yes, Calzaghe fought a great fight last night, but I'm talking about RJJ circa 1994-1995. The one at 168.

    Also, Joe landed some good punches but I wouldn't call his right hands viscious lol.
    I didn't call Joe's right hand viscious. Stop putting words in my mouth. But, he does have power, power enough to sit Chris Eubanks down for the first time in his celebrated career. 32 KOs says it all regarding Joe's power. IMO he's got plenty enough to break Roy's glass jaw. And, more importantly, he could get to his jaw.

    Leave a comment:


  • Easy-E
    replied
    Roy would have won, he was a phenom.
    Joe is great, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThaHorseman
    replied
    Originally posted by Mozza View Post
    They wouldn't get sent to prison anyway.
    Tell that to Barry Bonds' trainer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mozza
    replied
    Originally posted by ThaHorseman View Post
    Judging by the fact that he is not in prison, I would say that his steroid use has not been proven. So again I ask, based on their abilities in the ring...
    They wouldn't get sent to prison anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThaHorseman
    replied
    Originally posted by Wiley Hyena View Post
    I don't have to "come up with an argument." The evidence is right before your eyes. Just look at what Calzaghe just did to Kessler. Now imagine Kessler landing those same viscious right hands on Roy's jaw. I don't see Tarver as being any more formidable than Kessler to be honest. It's not hard to see why Calzaghe could take RJJ. Would I bet money on it? No. But, Calzaghe has the aggression, the chin, and the style to get in and land on Roy.
    Yes, Calzaghe fought a great fight last night, but I'm talking about RJJ circa 1994-1995. The one at 168.

    Also, Joe landed some good punches but I wouldn't call his right hands viscious lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThaHorseman
    replied
    Originally posted by divad View Post
    you are also not imune to criticism if there are aqusations that u have taken drugs and there is not evidence to prove it to be false

    your the one doing the assuming that he is not in Jail so he cant be guilty or there is no evidence,like i said u dont need evidence to be guilty but u do need it to be tried
    If there is not investigation, and no relevant evidence then I don't believe you can assume someone is guilty or criticize them. If someone is being investigated then I would say that you need to wait for the results to make assumptions. The laws were created that way, so that people weren't hung and tortured by people who just attacked without proof (hint, hint)

    Leave a comment:


  • Wiley Hyena
    replied
    Originally posted by ThaHorseman View Post
    Just a question to those who are discrediting RJJ. Why do you think Calzaghe would win? Besides trashing Jones for "ducking" or using steroids, try coming up with an argument based on the 2 fighters abilities in the ring.
    I don't have to "come up with an argument." The evidence is right before your eyes. Just look at what Calzaghe just did to Kessler. Now imagine Kessler landing those same viscious right hands on Roy's jaw. I don't see Tarver as being any more formidable than Kessler to be honest. It's not hard to see why Calzaghe could take RJJ. Would I bet money on it? No. But, Calzaghe has the aggression, the chin, and the style to get in and land on Roy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dynamite Kid
    replied
    Originally posted by ThaHorseman View Post
    Holyfield is the only one under investigation.

    If there is no evidence you can't assume someone is guilty. So again I ask, based on their.... ah **** it, you'll never man up and answer.
    you are also not imune to criticism if there are aqusations that u have taken drugs and there is not evidence to prove it to be false

    your the one doing the assuming that he is not in Jail so he cant be guilty or there is no evidence,like i said u dont need evidence to be guilty but u do need it to be tried

    Leave a comment:


  • ThaHorseman
    replied
    Originally posted by divad View Post
    well u dont know the in and outs there is not smoke without fire ,Mosley unknowingly yeah according to him

    no mention of Evans Field i see

    even if their is no evidence it does'nt mean u are no guilty it just means u cant be tried

    as for Toney i dont know the ins and outs of it but i suspect your are omitting some detail into it to suit your argument


    Holyfield,RJJ ,Toney ,Mosley all coincidences yeah im wiht u LMFAO
    Holyfield is the only one under investigation.

    If there is no evidence you can't assume someone is guilty. So again I ask, based on their.... ah **** it, you'll never man up and answer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dynamite Kid
    replied
    I dont think Evander is in prision either great little story about him thought that really was a coincidence i take it

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X
TOP