Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Moore v Rhodes

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Savino View Post
    But it's just a ****** way to describe a Boxing fight. Boxing doesn't work that way. Just cos a fighter has more potential than him doesn't mean he should win a fight. I wouldn't be suprised if Jennings beat Brook next week cos he is a quality domestic/europran fighter.
    So our best talent being beaten by a good domestic fighter isn't a shame?

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Šemise View Post
      So our best talent being beaten by a good domestic fighter isn't a shame?
      But he's not our best talent obviously. Rhodes is more of a talent, which is why he TKO'd Moore. It's not even debatable, I'm talking FACTS.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by span View Post
        But he's not our best talent obviously. Rhodes is more of a talent, which is why he TKO'd Moore. It's not even debatable, I'm talking FACTS.
        no no no. The blue print to beat Rhodes was set my Lockket. Ok Rhodes won, but he is the type of fighter to just get his ass beat highly likely by (Anthony Small, Bradley Pryce even Matthew Hall)

        Where as Moore (ok he lost) is likely to re-evaluate himself and come back even stronger and will learn from his mistakes, a la David Haye. Rhodes wont learn and you will see this when he steps up. Anyway hes just a bum on the domestic scene who wont go far.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by span View Post
          But he's not our best talent obviously. Rhodes is more of a talent, which is why he TKO'd Moore. It's not even debatable, I'm talking FACTS.
          Are you ******ed?

          I mean seriously?

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Šemise View Post
            Are you ******ed?

            I mean seriously?

            Why so? Explain why you think that, and why what I posted is so wrong.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by span View Post
              Why so? Explain why you think that, and why what I posted is so wrong.
              That you Naps?

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by span View Post
                Why so? Explain why you think that, and why what I posted is so wrong.
                Rhodes is 32 years old, 33 in a months time. Has a loss to Lockett as well as 2 TKO losses against crap opposition. His best win is Moore, who isn't really above European/domestic level. Rhodes has tried to get to the top before and failed, what makes you think he can go far enough?

                Where as Brook is an up and coming fighter who is showing a lot of potential. He's got a big test against Jennings in a week, but if he makes it past Jennings then he can certainly do better than what Rhodes has done. He's 10 years younger than Rhodes.

                I'm not sure on Brook's' amateur pedigree, but I'm sure it's better than Rhodes'.

                You look familiar...

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by -PlaT_NuM- View Post
                  That you Naps?
                  Yeah, I thought he smelt like Naps.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Šemise View Post
                    So our best talent being beaten by a good domestic fighter isn't a shame?
                    I wasn't making that point though was I? I was saying cos you have potential it doesn't mean you deserve to win a fight. but to answer you're question....


                    In a way yes and in a way no. I do think Brook is our best prospect at the minute to go on and win a world title, so we need him to put on a good show and beat Jennings to maybe get a title shot and win it. but losing to Jennings is nothing to be ashamed of imo.


                    In the UK at the minute we need more world champions, we have two world champion(not good enough) I do feel Kell is our next world champion but we shouldn't rush him just yet.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Lets face it.

                      British boxers are ****.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP