Prime Langford vs. Prime Johnson

[Dr. Z]

HAHAHA, cracking myself up. What do you say Travesty?

JACK JOHNSON SIGNS.; Negro to Get $50,000 for Bouts with Langford and McVey.

https://www.nytimes.com/1912/10/13/a...gford-and.html

[travestyny]

HAHAHA, cracking myself up. What do you say Travesty?

JACK JOHNSON SIGNS.; Negro to Get $50,000 for Bouts with Langford and McVey.

https://www.nytimes.com/1912/10/13/a...gford-and.html

I already responded to it, dumbass

Stop embarrassing yourself. Canceled by the promoters. LMAO

Don't you feel ******



You been stalling all this time...just to buy time to come back with information that proves you're wrong Dumbo.

[Dr. Z]

PS: He signed for Langford 1909 and other times. I guess Johnson didn't like February 1909, but oh, May was better? Duck, Duck, Duck...

" I undertake and agree to carry out my contest with Langford in Feb 1909" - Jack Johnson.

So he agreed to do it. Johnson by the way lies all the time, as I showed you. Free tip don't take his word as fact.

[travestyny]

PS: He signed for Langford 1909 and other times. I guess Johnson didn't like February 1909, but oh, May was better? Duck, Duck, Duck...

Uh, no. He didn't like $4000 win and $2000 lose.

" I undertake and agree to carry out my contest with Langford in Feb 1909" - Jack Johnson.

So he agreed to do it. Johnson by the way lies all the time, as I showed you. Free tip don't take his word as fact.

Again, the Feb. fight was OFF after Tommy Burns agreed to meet him. There is no sign of a contract that he would fight for $4000 after becoming champion


I think you know you're wrong now. LMAO.

[Dr. Z]

LOL, more. Read this

https://www.boxingnewsonline.net/whe...ame-to-the-uk/

As Johnson refused to carry out the bargain 1909, Langford fought Hague instead in the UK.

[travestyny]

LOL, more. Read this

https://www.boxingnewsonline.net/whe...ame-to-the-uk/

As Johnson refused to carry out the bargain 1909, Langford fought Hague instead in the UK.

Where is the contract that he supposedly signed? Where is anyone even saying that he signed a contract for May.


Still waitingggggggggg.....

[Dr. Z]

Uh, no. He didn't like $4000 win and $2000 lose.






Again, the Feb. fight was OFF after Tommy Burns agreed to meet him. There is no sign of a contract that he would fight for $4000 after becoming champion


I think you know you're wrong now. LMAO.

1 ) How care what he liked, He signed it. He said he honor it. He did not.

2 ) Burns lost in 1908, we are talking about 1909 + the numerous other offers that never happened with Johnson just because..

[Dr. Z]

Where is the contract that he supposedly signed? Where is anyone even saying that he signed a contract for May.


Still waitingggggggggg.....

1909 February. He balked, just like you are. Dude your wrong.

[travestyny]

" I undertake and agree to carry out my contest with Langford in Feb 1909" - Jack Johnson.

So he agreed to do it. Johnson by the way lies all the time, as I showed you. Free tip don't take his word as fact.

Clearly states if Tommy Burns agrees, February is out.


October 1908 -- "It is probable that if he is assured of meeting Tommy he would call off the Langford engagement and journey to the island continent."

Proof that they didn't even have a deal with Langford yet for the May 1909 bout.


January 13th, 1909. "The fight to take place in London sometime in May. [Langford's manager] demanded a guarantee from the club before he would consider terms."

They didn't have shlt for a May fight. They just showed the February contract and tried to use that to get Jack Johnson to put up the title for $4000 win and $2000 lose.

[travestyny]

1909 February. He balked, just like you are. Dude your wrong.

How could he balk when all sides agreed the February fight would be off so he could fight Tommy Burns, dumbass

He never agreed to fight in May for $4000. If he did, they would have shown THAT contract instead of one for Febrary before Tommy Burns agreed to fight

Give up, son.