Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Most overrated boxer in history?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by butterfly1964
    wow, that's biased. i could name 5 hw's that was better. ali, holmes, louis, foreman, tyson and others.
    YOUR PUTTING TYSON OVER MARCIANO?! HAHAHAHA BYE BYE BUTTERFLY'S CREDITABLITY! IF YOU STILL HAD ANY LEFT.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by rocco1252
      YOUR PUTTING TYSON OVER MARCIANO?! HAHAHAHA BYE BYE BUTTERFLY'S CREDITABLITY! IF YOU STILL HAD ANY LEFT.
      yes, because he's better. He's bigger, faster, stronger, hit's harder, more skilled, better chin, need I go on?

      Comment


      • Tyson beat one of the greatest Lightheavyweight Champions in history, Michael Spinks, in 1 round...I wonder how long it would of taken Marciano?

        Comment


        • Tyson beat one of the greatest Lightheavyweight Champions in history, Michael Spinks, in 1 round...I wonder how long it would of taken Marciano?
          Probably about 1 round. It is a light heavy after all and Marciano is a cruiser... i mean a heavyweight.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Southpaw Stinger
            Probably about 1 round. It is a light heavy after all and Marciano is a cruiser... i mean a heavyweight.

            Then lets say Floyd Patterson, Gene Tunney, Marciano, Jack Dempsey, Evander Holyfield etc would be ko'd in 1 round because they were from lower weight classes. Spinks was bigger than all of these guys except for Holyfield. So why do you say he was a LHW and nothing more, when he beat a very good HW at around 200.

            Comment


            • Then lets say Floyd Patterson, Gene Tunney, Marciano, Jack Dempsey, Evander Holyfield etc would be ko'd in 1 round because they were from lower weight classes. Spinks was bigger than all of these guys except for Holyfield. So why do you say he was a LHW and nothing more, when he beat a very good HW at around 200.
              I was joking man since Marciano is from a lower weight to.....

              Comment


              • Lol, right i didnt see the above post.



                Anyway, do yall think Morrison was a bit overrated in the 90s?..

                Comment


                • Anyway, do yall think Morrison was a bit overrated in the 90s?..
                  You can thank Sylvester Stallone for that!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by butterfly1964
                    yes, because he's better. He's bigger, faster, stronger, hit's harder, more skilled, better chin, need I go on?
                    He's Bigger, more skilled and Faster yes, not more powerful, had no heart, couldnt fight going backwards, got knocked out by danny williams, buster douglas, lewis and holyfield, and quit against mcbride says alot about your so called "Iron" Mike Tyson.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by rocco1252
                      He's Bigger, more skilled and Faster yes, not more powerful, had no heart, couldnt fight going backwards, got knocked out by danny williams, buster douglas, lewis and holyfield, and quit against mcbride says alot about your so called "Iron" Mike Tyson.
                      and should I also mention that Holyfield was a blown up cruiserweight who beat Tyson wait not once but twice! Need I say more Fly?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP