How would the Top champs from the past hold up against today's best realistically? With modern training methods/equipment etc and fitness vs the old days.
I don't see many of the old guys realistically beating the modern guys.
And no the old guys get none of the modern benefits.
Again this is not a debate about who is better but rather a debate into the evolution of the sport.
What say you?
I don't see many of the old guys realistically beating the modern guys.
And no the old guys get none of the modern benefits.
Again this is not a debate about who is better but rather a debate into the evolution of the sport.
What say you?
Comment