Tweet
Originally posted by sonnyboyx2
View Post
Your too big and heavy for me 
-
That doesn't say much from the ant of boxing scene...aren't you tired of getting stepped on with your ******ity that's easily countered?
-
explain to me how a brilliantly skilled fighter, would have zero chance against a fighter 7'2'' and 350lbs.. He is simply TOO BIGOriginally posted by juggernaut666 View PostThat doesn't say much from the ant of boxing scene...aren't you tired of getting stepped on with your ******ity that's easily countered?
You are the laughing stock of the forum.. Everyone has abandoned the History section, because you have turned it into a ridiculous joke. your argument in every thread: "He is TOO BIG " LOL you foolish cvntLast edited by sonnyboyx2; 12-10-2015, 02:32 AM.Comment
-
Why, you've got to admit, Sonny, a seven hundred pound man of thirteen feet with normal talent and reflexes for his size would clean up on the all time heavyweight division. I mean can you imagine the footwork possible with thirteen feet?Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Postexplain to me how a brilliantly skilled fighter, would have zero chance against a fighter 7'2'' and 350lbs.. He is simply TOO BIG
You are the laughing stock of the forum.. Everyone has abandoned the History section, because you have turned it into a ridiculous joke. your argument in every thread: "He is TOO BIG " LOL you foolish cvntComment
-
That's funny b/c everyone mocks you, bill absolutely belittles you like a child ! continue reading downward.....Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Postexplain to me how a brilliantly skilled fighter, would have zero chance against a fighter 7'2'' and 350lbs.. He is simply TOO BIG
You are the laughing stock of the forum.. Everyone has abandoned the History section, because you have turned it into a ridiculous joke. your argument in every thread: "He is TOO BIG " LOL you foolish cvntLast edited by juggernaut666; 12-10-2015, 09:14 PM.Comment
-
:Because guys like folley simply would be outsized and out sped...see you are to dumb to see or except this..Wilt on length alone just like Terrell would give ali more a fight you nit wit...Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Postexplain to me how a brilliantly skilled fighter, would have zero chance against a fighter 7'2'' and 350lbs.. He is simply TOO BIG
You are the laughing stock of the forum.. Everyone has abandoned the History section, because you have turned it into a ridiculous joke. your argument in every thread: "He is TOO BIG " LOL you foolish cvnt
And no you are the least liked here..go see your lewis posts and see just how much everyone treats you like the red headed step child daily on here ...do a poll and see how much,i dare you...all you are known for is as the LIAR of the history section . :wank:
"you are like my youngest child Sonny. When he gets ridiculous he throws tantrums" billeau2
The above quote sizes you up perfectly!Last edited by juggernaut666; 12-10-2015, 09:52 PM.Comment
-
Your only argument is: "He would be too big".. LOLOriginally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
I am the least liked" - LOL that is funny jugger.. i don't post to be liked mate, i post solely to show how knowledgeable i am. Nothing else, just to show how knowledgeable i am. My Lennox Lewis posts are 100% on the money. 100% knowledgeable from a guy who knows inside out, the career of Lennox Lewis. You and Elroy1, Billeau etc who are Lewis ball svckers, are "The Small Minority" go to any boxing forum on the web, and post your Lewis drivel. You will be destroyed by boxing people who tell it exactly as i do. Lewis was "Nothing Special" He was no better than Frank Bruno!.
But hey jugger, keep it up little boy. your comments are laughable. Zora Folley had no skill.. LOL Well Muhammad Ali told Folley's son, "Your father was the skilfullest fighter i ever fought, he would have been heavyweight champion, if i was not around"...... But Hey Jugger, what the **** does that guy Muhammad Ali know about boxing?.. You Jugger are the guy who is correct. Folley was shyte and "Wilt the Stilt" would have knocked **** out of Muhammad Ali coz he was TOO BIG... LOLComment
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
My argument is its Wilt a highly athletic person ...you fool...folley was decent,but in 1967 he was average just like all the guys ali actually fought if we were to compare them to Wilt a trained guy under cus..win or lose ..again...moron..then look in the mirror!
Last edited by juggernaut666; 12-12-2015, 03:08 AM.Comment
-
LOL... Folley and every other Muhammad Ali opponent would destroy Wilt the Stilt..They were all "World Class Prizefighters" who held a world ranking. Wilt had never boxed a single minute in his entire life.Originally posted by juggernaut666 View PostMy argument is its Wilt a highly athletic person ...you fool...folley was decent,but in 1967 he was average just like all the guys ali actually fought if we were to compare them to Wilt a trained guy under cus..win or lose ..again...moron! How could he possible go from zero bout novice, to world caliber fighter, in the space of a couple of months?. Cus D'Amato, you are overestimating. Cus's claim to fame is the "Peek-a-Boo" style, along with a couple of mediocre world champions he trained. D'Amato could not turn a fighter even with Chamberlain's athletic ability, into a world class boxer overnight. It takes at least 10yrs. it takes at least 10yrs no matter who is training the pupil...take a look at this link below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mqsRyaRnpY
Then please stop talking foolish and trying to convince others, with your ******, idiotic, childish agenda'a. You comments on Muhammad Ali & His opponents, are the most foolish i have ever encountered.Comment
-
Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View PostLOL... Folley and every other Muhammad Ali opponent would destroy Wilt the Stilt..They were all "World Class Prizefighters" who held a world ranking. Wilt had never boxed a single minute in his entire life. How could he possible go from zero bout novice, to world caliber fighter, in the space of a couple of months?. Cus D'Amato, you are overestimating. Cus's claim to fame is the "Peek-a-Boo" style, along with a couple of mediocre world champions he trained. D'Amato could not turn a fighter even with Chamberlain's athletic ability, into a world class boxer overnight. It takes at least 10yrs. it takes at least 10yrs no matter who is training the pupil...take a look at this link below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mqsRyaRnpY
Then please stop talking foolish and trying to convince others, with your ******, idiotic, childish agenda'a. You comments on Muhammad Ali & His opponents, are the most foolish i have ever encountered.
not in the time frame Ali fought them..and even then Wilt would have cus...really you are just an idiot to think the best guys ali fought in the late 60's provide better competiioon theoretically....look up "FOOL" again ...that is you! If not for anything thinking a 7'2 300 pound athletic guy is less competition..Do yourself a favor an delete your user name on boxing scene before I really get started...
Comment
-
HaHa Ha.... i've burst your bubble jugger. answer my post instead of personal ridicule directed at me. You don't know me, you know nothing about me. I have exposed you and your "TOO BIG" argument as nothing but fanciful. Your in dream land my friend, claiming Folley was ordinary is ridiculous. claiming Ali's opponents as average, is laughable and claiming Wilt Chaimberlain would beat Muhammad Ali is a ****ing howler.. LOLOriginally posted by juggernaut666 View Postnot in the time frame Ali fought them..and even then Wilt would have cus...really you are just an idiot to think the best guys ali fought in the late 60's provide better competiioon theoretically....look up "FOOL" again ...that is you! If not for anything thinking a 7'2 300 pound athletic guy is less competition..Do yourself a favor an delete your user name on boxing scene before I really get started...Comment
Comment