::
Wilt Chamberlain > 1967 Folley
odds were about 7 or 10 to 1 then I think?Doesnt really matter.....
Wilt chamberlain < Ali Odds would be no smaller than 5 to 1
Fantasy < Reality
A 20 /1 odds would only be feasible if Wilt doesn't fight any one but Ali. That doesn't detract he makes a better opponent for Ali than the washed up non athletic ones,this would be mainly due to ignorance however...only a fool cant see a 7'1 giant under Cus being more dangerous....you just wont admit that like most on here...then you would have to admit potentially better fighters could have existed in Alis 60's era. WeALL know they came along in the 70's.
50 to 1??lol...yea just like Listons 90 inch reach right?
Best example I can give in the actual 60's era would be Folley vs Terrell...who won that fight the better boxer or the taller one.?..yet you are selling me Folley defeats a guy like Valuev at 7'0 300 pounds? With better skill than Terrell also....
Originally posted by sonnyboyx2
View Post
odds were about 7 or 10 to 1 then I think?Doesnt really matter.....
Wilt chamberlain < Ali Odds would be no smaller than 5 to 1
Fantasy < Reality
A 20 /1 odds would only be feasible if Wilt doesn't fight any one but Ali. That doesn't detract he makes a better opponent for Ali than the washed up non athletic ones,this would be mainly due to ignorance however...only a fool cant see a 7'1 giant under Cus being more dangerous....you just wont admit that like most on here...then you would have to admit potentially better fighters could have existed in Alis 60's era. WeALL know they came along in the 70's.
50 to 1??lol...yea just like Listons 90 inch reach right?
Best example I can give in the actual 60's era would be Folley vs Terrell...who won that fight the better boxer or the taller one.?..yet you are selling me Folley defeats a guy like Valuev at 7'0 300 pounds? With better skill than Terrell also....

Comment