I have looked into these guys careers from the fabled "Murderers Row" and some claim these guys were all ATG's but Lytell and Marshall clearly are not, their resumes look reasonable if you only take wins into account but of course we have to count the losses and they lost so so many and often against novices or nobodies and to some ATG's.... Marshall was knocked out 11 times, nowhere near good enough for any ATG, his defence was just not good enough although he had good speed and plenty of power punching ability. The less said about Lytell the better.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lloyd Marshall and Bert Lytell Overrated
Collapse
-
How is Bert Lytell overrated when barely anyone has heard of him and he isn't even in the HOF?
Beat the likes of Burley, Williams, Basora, Oakland Billy Smith x2, Cocoa Kid, Henry Hall
Many ringside observers had him beating Jake Lamotta.
Close loss to Harold Johnson.
Doesn't sound too bad to me.
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostHow is Bert Lytell overrated when barely anyone has heard of him and he isn't even in the HOF?
Beat the likes of Burley, Williams, Basora, Oakland Billy Smith x2, Cocoa Kid, Henry Hall
Many ringside observers had him beating Jake Lamotta.
Close loss to Harold Johnson.
Doesn't sound too bad to me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by McGoorty View PostWell I have seen Lytell listed as high as top 20 MW of all time so that's what I am going on, had some good wins but many horrible losses which far outweigh his wins, same goes for Marshall.
Especially if you were to include his controversial loss to Lamotta.
Comment
-
Originally posted by McGoorty View PostWell I have seen Lytell listed as high as top 20 MW of all time so that's what I am going on, had some good wins but many horrible losses which far outweigh his wins, same goes for Marshall.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View PostHe could be. He has wins strong enough to make an argument.
Especially if you were to include his controversial loss to Lamotta.
Comment
-
Both were good contenders in their day but not great fighters. In a time period where a fighter will fight many times a year then a good world level contender is going to pick up some good names on their win column but that doesn't mean they are great.
Comment
-
Originally posted by McGoorty View PostMate you don't seem to even consider losses, I will go into it all after I have a sleep, but I will demonstrate his weaknesses outweigh his wins. I can also name 30 mw's at least with better credentials and just better,, we are talking about an incredible division with incredible depth.Last edited by McGoorty; 08-27-2015, 02:15 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Humean View PostBoth were good contenders in their day but not great fighters. In a time period where a fighter will fight many times a year then a good world level contender is going to pick up some good names on their win column but that doesn't mean they are great.
Comment
-
Comment